[TheRealThing]

^^ This article is nothing more than a DNC developed story, and an example of clever slight of hand. Desperate Lieberals have run out of room where it comes to plausible deniability. And so, the rationale is "yeah, we may have done this but THEY did it first." Thinking people recognized they were being duped long before the media reluctantly began to address these situations. For example, the real time incidents which were shown on the national news told the Benghazi story, the follow up spin was an obvious attempt at damage control.

The playbook has gone as follows; when confronted by any form of evidence exposing administration missteps, flaws or their true agenda, Dems have stonewalled and deflected. I mean, how many paid (by the people) public servants have to take the fifth before you guys will start to get the drift? The fortunes of our country are more important than those of the Democratic Party. Whose wagon circling defiance has been apparent since the days when they first revealed they were willing to corrupt our system of government, rather than see Bill Clinton suffer the just remedy for his deeds.

Often times there is precedent for these objectionable activities, we're talking about. The difference may be in the length to which this administration and Dems in general, are willing to stretch credibility. There is a big difference between the sausage making of the recent past, and what we're seeing these days as our President totally sidesteps the US Congress.

But to your article. To expect anybody to believe that Rove dumped 22 million emails, or to accept there is anyway possible to even generate that many communications about the dismissal of 8 judges is ridiculous. And to compare that so-called scandal BTW, to the likes of the IRS or Benghazi, is laughable. But how many State Department emails did Hill say were flushed, 32 thousand? 22 million emails about 8 judges versus 32 thousand about Benghazi---:eyeroll: