1. Bluegrassrivals
  2. Off Topic
  3. Classic BlueGrassRivals
  4. Ripkin or PLL...why not both?


  Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ripkin or PLL...why not both?
Eagle Pride 90` Offline
Equipment Manager
**
Posts: 246
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#9
02-21-2006, 12:10 AM
"The Guru" Wrote:I honestly am not trying to start anything with my comments here but is it true that kids that are in Middle school on up at Johnson County have been told, or at least warned, that if they choose PLL over Cal Ripken that they would not be welcomed to play for Johnson County Middle or High School???
I do know that at least a couple of kids that played on PLL Jr. league State champs team seemed very excited about this coming year and having a chance at a 3 peat for State, and were very dad set that they were going to play for PLL, then now have changed their minds and are playing Babe Ruth. I was told that Playing for their Middle/High school teams became in jeapordy.
I honestly don't know if there is any truth to this and I hope not. But does anyone know the truth???
I do know that if my son chose to play Babe Ruth it would have no effect on his play at Paintsville, Varsity or JV.
I doubt this is true. I have been to every Cal Ripken meeting and it has always been said it will not be held against anyone who stays at PLL. That being said I am sure the JCMS and JCHS coaches would encourage those kids in the 13-15 division to play middle school ball because their seasons coinside. The junior league played four games last year before all-stars, so what happens to those kids who don't make all-stars? PLL hangs it's hat on it's all-star play and they have alot to be proud of but the new league will be great for the 13-15 division. If your son will not have it held against him for playing Babe Ruth why not bring him over? I'm sure he will be welcomed with open arms. If everyone did this they could keep that team together and play alot more baseball. Do you think it would be harder to win a state tournament in the babe ruth division. I hear alot of people saying this was a political move and I'm sure politics played it's part,but if polotics isn't played both ways why aren't more paintsville kids signing up for this new league. The new league has more money, and has no problem keeping up with it. the facilities at PLL have went to pot the last two years and the only reason you will see upgrades is the threat of this new league. So if nothing else the parents of PLL should thank the Cal Ripken league for helping get their program back in shape. PLL is full of good hard working parents and I hope it flourishes.
Find Share
 Next Oldest | Next Newest 
  Thread Closed
Messages In This Thread
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 03:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-20-2006, 08:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-20-2006, 08:43 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by corndog23 - 02-20-2006, 09:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-20-2006, 09:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-20-2006, 09:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 11:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-20-2006, 11:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Pride 90` - 02-21-2006, 12:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 12:20 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:18 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-21-2006, 01:25 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:48 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:51 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 02:53 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:55 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:22 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:34 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Fuzzy5118 - 02-21-2006, 03:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-21-2006, 10:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 10:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 12:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 01:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 02:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 02:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 03:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 03:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 07:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-21-2006, 08:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 12:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 03:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-22-2006, 10:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JOHNBOY1956 - 02-22-2006, 01:45 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by tigerman2163 - 02-22-2006, 03:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-22-2006, 05:33 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-22-2006, 05:35 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by rockhouse - 02-26-2006, 12:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Old School - 02-26-2006, 01:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 02:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-26-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 10:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-27-2006, 12:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:29 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 01:06 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 01:24 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-27-2006, 10:46 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-27-2006, 03:07 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 03:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-27-2006, 03:55 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 02-27-2006, 03:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-27-2006, 06:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 11:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-28-2006, 06:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-28-2006, 04:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 11:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 02:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 02:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 05:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-21-2006, 06:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-22-2006, 12:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-22-2006, 11:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-22-2006, 01:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 12:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-23-2006, 12:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 01:38 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 11:28 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:16 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:57 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:05 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 04:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 01:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 04:01 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 05:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:08 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 12:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 04:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 05:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 01:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 09:54 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:50 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:52 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-28-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 01:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 01:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 02:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 03-28-2006, 03:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 04:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 04:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 06:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 11:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-29-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by 2000PHS - 03-29-2006, 01:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-01-2006, 09:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-02-2006, 01:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 06:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 07:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 10:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-02-2006, 11:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-03-2006, 09:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-04-2006, 10:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 10:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-05-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-05-2006, 11:07 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 03:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-05-2006, 04:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 05:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-05-2006, 11:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-05-2006, 11:36 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-05-2006, 11:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cardsfan - 04-06-2006, 12:59 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-06-2006, 09:43 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:20 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:28 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-14-2006, 10:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-14-2006, 11:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-14-2006, 10:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by airball3 - 04-14-2006, 11:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-15-2006, 12:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-17-2006, 02:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 09:23 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:04 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:37 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 12:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 12:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 05:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-17-2006, 05:54 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-17-2006, 08:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-17-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 11:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-17-2006, 11:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:40 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 06:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-18-2006, 08:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 08:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:01 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:05 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 09:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-18-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 03:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-19-2006, 11:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-20-2006, 11:05 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)