[TheRealThing]

Great response, but once again when was it ever said that people's guns would be taken away?

Thanks. In the recent past we have seen the Obama era edition of the EPA successfully declare lead bullets a hazardous substance to the environment. Therefore, lead smelters and ammunition manufacturers have fallen on tough times. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/con...production

Likewise, we have seen Eric Holder's DOJ use their authority to clamp down on gun shops. "For the past several months, the U.S. Department of Justice has been pressuring banks to refuse service to businesses the DOJ is targeting politically, such as gun stores, in a program entitled Operation Choke Point." http://www.infowars.com/holders-latest-s...un-stores/

Further, if you want to spend the time you may want to look into the UN initiative (agreed to and countersigned by Sec. of State John Kerry) to control weapons and ammunition via the “National regulation of civilian access to small arms and light weapons”
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/con...-advancing

Or like they say, "actions speak louder than words." Additionally, it is extremely doubtful that any President would jump up and say he's coming for "the people's" guns. It is much more likely a path to try to regulate them (guns) to the point where they are too expensive or too big a liability for most law abiding folks to own. Of course if you're a criminal you don't care if they're legal or not, you'd just get them the same way you have always gotten them. Only legal gun ownership will be regulated. So, how would that improve the criminal aspects of gun violence?