[TheRealThing]

My point has never been to suggest who is and who is not righteous or racist. It has been to suggest that "original intent" cannot be the end all be all of Constitutional interpretation because the Framer's "we" was not inclusive, and the principles of Justice and equal protection under the law, when denied to a person or a group, should not be beholden to an injurious majority to decide when and where to grant Justice and equity to an injured minority. The legislatures of the various states, and the U.S. Congress, are not the final arbiters of the most basic "blessings of liberty," and history is a witness to that truth.

Point #1 You wouldn't know anything of what you're saying because you're barely 50 if that.

Point #2 You're white and part of the majority. To make matters worse, you're a country boy who grew up around precious few of any minority.

Point #3 Equal protection does not apply to acts of depravity.

Point #4 According to one of your past leaders, you all don't know what the definition of is, is, much less what the definition of we, is.