[TheRealThing]

I will only address point #3, as the rest are just various forms of insult having no bearing on the issue at hand. No relationship is just the act of sex, however, it appears that is where you are fixated. The "act of depravity" you termed it. Most Christians would label that act sin. However, a civil government is not a church board and grants freedom of conscience in a whole host of behaviors and choices that its individual representatives may well detest. A civil government such as ours is inclusive in the "we," even when personal convictions and beliefs might oppose the particular choices and behaviors. Another example might be pornography being utterly rampant on the internet. I oppose it, wish it wasn't so, think it degrades and dehumanizes, yet its right to be there is protected by civil authority.

Points 1,2 &4 were observations not insults.

And let's be clear, the issue at hand is your continuing attempt to validate homosexuality. And don't try that reverse psychology on me cause everybody on this board knows the homo fixation is yours. I am the one who some years ago, first mentioned to you that if you have issue with Christendom calling out sin, your problem is with God not us. We are the messengers, God is the law giver. And frankly, it is not like we have any choice in the matter. We are to call out sin, and that is not optional to the individual Christian, rather it is a requirement to all.

Your arguments have always amazed me. You argue for separation of Church and State because you don't want Christ's influence in government. But you don't mind a bit when government steps outside it's role and presumes to amend, codify, or otherwise overturn the law of God. As of today, the government has not offered to pass laws stating that it is okay to lie, cheat, steal, etc. Only in killing our own unborn and in ratifying the sin of homosexuality have they dared to so blatantly shake their fist in the face of God. Those two sins therefore deserve the most attention.

In any case, the Scripture is clear. In Romans Chapter 1, verses 18-20, God declares to us that He has revealed Himself to every man through Creation. In verses 21-23 He recalls being rejected of men who became fools and changed the glory of God into idols and other conceptions of man. In verse 24 God declares that man's degeneration is measured by his perversion of sex. It was at that point that He began to give them up. And as verse 25 further proclaims, men began to exchange the true God for the lie.

That lie is the product and purview of Satan, and he is the god of this present, Christ-rejecting world, and the father of most of mankind who BTW, reflect the attributes of him as their mouths are full of guile. God therefore is the One Who called out the seriousness of the signpost sin of homosexuality in the book of Romans. In any case imaginable, the 'we' in 'we the people' was never intended to include the sexually depraved as a protected class. Even more significant as it applies to your adopted argument, the society that the founders set up righted it's own ship with regard to slavery, black people and the like. People like you can't let it go because IMHO it is the revolution you crave, not the resolution.