[The Urban Sombrero]

And there in the midst of your contemplations and the resultant ill advised conclusions attached thereto, you'd find yourself firmly entrenched among a very small minority of liberal true believers; Desperately searching for the right catch phrase to effectively do another DADT-esque flyby on the American public. This time however, I do not believe you're going to see it happen, that is the American people accepting gun control . As you point out the SC did outlaw sawed off shotguns at one point, the bias of that ruling was later recognized and the Justices overturned their own decision.

You cannot hope to drag out some dishwater weak misinterpretation of a phrase like "well regulated," taking it completely out of context, then add further insult to injury in redefining it's true meaning and expect the people to stand idly by and watch the second Amendment get struck down because they have been sufficiently hazed, not this time.

You speak of "striking down the 2nd Amendment." I would not agree that the amendment was "struck down" if military style "mass kill" weapons had an extremely stringent regulatory process before an individual citizen could procure. What you are engaging in is argument of the extreme, and that is a logical fallacy. Is the only choice either that family in Pike County cower in the corner, or maw and paw and brother and sister grab an AR-15? I thought we were discussing military style, "mass kill" weaponry, NOT a Nazi style roundup of all weapons.