[Hoot Gibson]

No see you have to establish the first time I was wrong before you get to say that I'm wrong 'again.'

Are these your words or not? "A large majority of Republicans who voted in primaries and caucuses did not vote for Donald Trump. If, by some miracle of fate, the GOP delegates replace Trump with a strong candidate and a majority of the delegates, who themselves were elected to represent large numbers of other Republicans, unite behind another candidate, then how will the "will of the people" have been thwarted?"

And with deference to what Seger said, my concern here has been to protect the outcome of the primary season. Country should come first, and being truthful don't hurt either.

Yes, those are my words. Fewer than 45 percent of voters in the primaries and caucuses supported Trump and a large number of them were Democrats, like yourself, who voted for Trump in open primaries. So, even if delegates did vote their consciences and replace Trump on the ballot, the will of the majority of Republicans would not be thwarted, because the majority of Republicans never supported Trump in the first place.

This is a factually correct statement, whether you like it or not. If you were so concerned about the primary process, then you should have registered as a Republican and participated yourself.

As for my statement of you being wrong again, you being wrong is a frequent occurrence. I don't need to elaborate. For example, you were wrong, as a registered Democrat who was too busy to even vote in the Republican primary, to offer this conservative unsolicited advice and constant criticism for his voting plans. It was uncalled for and unappreciated.