[Hoot Gibson]

I have refuted them, especially the ones you have spewed out on this forum, time and time again. As to this idea about opinion makers goes, you at one time said you were going to vote for Trump. Then like throwing a switch, you went OCD in a millisecond and began posting hundreds of distortion infused tirades with which you intended to do Trump damage.

I don't think you can discern truth from lies. I believe the record of our founding clearly shows the deference the framers gave to our Creator, as should we. To do that requires more than a passing personal commitment, something most just cannot muster. In the foolhardy effort to separate Spiritual truth from Constitutional truth we have forfeited two things, the authority to govern, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong. And I believe your inability to interface the truths of His Word with the realities of this world limits you profoundly in general terms. But you insist that voting for the lesser of two flawed candidates is beneath your highly evolved political sensitivities, a rationale that is as shallow in my view, as it is untethered in any practical sense. An honest comparison between her record and Trump's, disqualifies her candidacy on moral and ethical grounds, and frankly most would add legal.

You're continually sidestepping the forest while looking for the trees. And your objectivity is clouded by a bias that would be obvious to even the most causal reader. Saying that, Chris Christie would be an excellent AG. John Bolton an excellent Secretary of State. Any of the Judges listed by Mr Trump as potential Supreme Court appointees would be a God send for this country. Mike Pence is probably the most solid choice for VP of any I have seen in my entire lifetime. And the list goes on without drop off from there. The point is as I have already offered back before there was any evidence that I was right, in which I said that Trump, in Reaganesque style, will surround himself with good people and he will give them the space necessary to fulfill their duties.

If elected, things will get much better for this country in the first year. In fact, I've yet to hear any official from the Reagan administration come forth to denounce Trump on policy grounds or any other for that matter. But there is one thing about you that you'll never worm your way out of, and that is the way that you have campaigned for Hillary. Given your ambitious, voluntary and persistent assaults on Trump, even Hillary's most servile and shameless adherent would view you a suitor to keep an eye on.

I never said I was voting for Trump. You are lying again, and once again you are declining to elaborate on the avalanche/tsunami of lies that you claim the media has perpetrated about Trump. As I have said before, nobody wastes more words than you do while contributing so little substance to a debate.

Again, I challenge you to stop generalizing about the media lies about Trump and start refuting them. Unlike you, I cast a vote against Hillary Clinton in a primary election and for a conservative named Ted Cruz. Cruz was always at the top of my list of candidates. I considered Trump, but put him on my "never, ever, not in a million years" list after he started smearing other Republicans with lie after lie. Character matters.

If I wanted to be treated to non-stop Trump propaganda, I would join you in spending my days and nights watching Fox News Network and Fox Business Channel. It should be easy for a Trump devotee such as yourself to meet my challenge and provide some specifics about the media lies about Trump. The media is obviously just as biased against Trump as they have been against every other Republican candidate who has run during the past four or five decades. Lying about such lousy candidates as Trump and Hillary is overkill, IMO, because the truth about them is devastating.