[The Urban Sombrero]

Oh it's Biblical alright friend. And if I were you I'd be very careful how I mitigated the clear teachings of the Word.

2 Corinthians 5:11 (KJV)
11 Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences.

I'll tell you what. You start backing up some of your Biblical assertions with Scripture and not that essential liberty blather of your liberal kindred's invention, and you may have a point. My view of God is exactly according to Scripture.

I did not say God rejects all who err, I did say God rejects all who come before Him who have not accepted Christ as Savior. I did further state that when one stands before The Living God at the judgment, only the blood of Christ will hide his sin from the eyes of God. And only a true salvation experience, in which one is sealed by the none other than the Holy Ghost Himself, can one hope to escape eternal damnation, separated from God. What I said is exactly right, men who overturn God's law with their own law are headed for judgment. And people who uphold and support the actions of men who do such things will bear the burden of that support, as in he case of voting for them in public elections.

The United States Supreme Court, in a sense, granted equal protection under the law to same sex couples in the basic human contract of marriage. Essential liberty is not blather. In fact, it squares with that aspect of God's will which grants human beings a choice, a free will, as He wanted love freely given, not coerced.

You are suggesting here the Divine right of kings for the Republican Party, and you're wrong. Your politics often informs your religion, in my view, as the tail wags the dog. If God "makes" His sun rise on the evil and the good, and "sends" rain on the just and unjust, it is not somehow horrific beyond measure for a court to grant equal protection to two consenting adults.