[The Urban Sombrero]

Of course Trump has a big mandate, how else would you characterize "valid and sweeping?" I would prefer that you at least be accurate when you quote me and then go on to build a case based on your own misconceptions and La-La Land alter-realities. But then, that is the stock and trade of the liberal. You say you want to debate, but there is little in your posts to debate. Feelings and elevated estrogen levels are not suitable debate parameters as far as I am concerned. I did notice though, that you've dropped all pretense as to originality, (the bolded). Instead of saving my use of vocabulary and inflection for later, you've taken the more immediate approach.

The present and mercifully outgoing administration, led by rabid chipmunks like Ben Rhodes, Valerie Jarrett, John Podesta, John Kerry and Jonathan Gruber has been a disaster. Everything they touched failed. But I see through your Freudian preoccupation with excrement of late. It will be "great again" to have a government whose priority rises to a level beyond a fascination with the deregulation of public bathrooms and imposing a unisex religious discipline on 'the people,' to again address things like national defense and the impossible level of debt the US has incurred, especially over the past 8 years. And now with desperation inundating the DNC sanctuary of identity politics, old Hill and John Podesta have seemingly abandoned all pretense of dignity in their push to lend validity to the Russian conspiracy theory du-jour.

So, here's to the hardy :flush: over which the voter saw fit preside, and at least 8 years of ensuing sanity. Hopefully, we will see a number of Supreme Court appointments. And heresies the likes of essential liberty and the recent rash of illegitimate activist bench legislations will suffer the same fate as those who dreamed them up.

:biggrin: I mean think of it, 8 glorious years of light. I may never get the smile off my face.

I see you join in the bashing of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Essential liberty is only heresy if you are selective in your use of history, as Christian Reconstructionists are, and certainly you are, and the evacuative intestinal mess your keyboard produces often prove it beyond dispute.