[TheRealThing]

So, now, I guess, the right to assemble for purposes of political protest is not in the Constitution? You are dangerous.

You said the Constitution names protests as being quintessentially American. Which of course is not true, but in light of the persecution which the inhabitants of the New World had just fled, the same being the authors of the First Amendment then, 'naturally' assumed those protesting would have right on their side. But no legitimate Constitutional scholar ever said there are no restrictions on the right to assemble. To say the Obama drawn connection between what happened in Ferguson has any parallel with petitioning government, (and as we all know that's what they said) is as ludacris as saying property damage and arson are guaranteed rights under the First Amendment.

As I have said, the thought processes which were deemed reasonable or more appropriately 'natural' to the Founders, and such reason continued to be the case up until as recently as the Bill Clinton Administration, have now changed for the sake of special interest groups. The common good is out the window, as George Soros dispatchees are at present protesting outside the Headquarters building of the McDonald's Corporation. Forget the fact that everybody, except likely the protestors themselves, knows McDonald's is a franchise and as such each individual store is a business entity unto itself. There are no across the board pay levels for McDonald's employees owing to individual state minimum wage laws.

In glorifying rioting, arson, property damage and assault, your hero Mr Obama politicized every thing from the Henry Gates affair, to the Trayvon Martin affair, to Occupy Main Street, to Muslim perpetrated violence, to daily life in this nation.

If I'm dangerous because I won't take a big gulp of monkey puke when it's passed around, then so be it. Still better than being the quintessential DNC parrot. I mean, the term bird brain takes on new meaning these days.