[TheRealThing]

I understand many people are perfectly content to accept the validity of Moore's accusers at face value. And in so doing, they are happy to run over the other side of the argument without so much as a glance. As I said, Senator Luther Strange's millions of dollars worth of opposition research yielded nothing of any clue of sexual predation. Only after the run-off election between the Steve Bannon backed Judge and sitting Senator Luther Strange was past, did the woodwork yield up all these Moore accusers.

Too late at that point to mount a campaign under the name of a new candidate, and too late at that point to keep Luther Strange in place. It's a classically mounted political ambush, of which a RINO Republican Speaker and an establishment Majority Leader mired in the norms of the past, seemingly bought into on the most superficial of terms. Paul Ryan already showed his borderless ideological bent when he leaped to the defense of illegal immigrants during the last Presidential campaign. Remember when he slammed Trump for rightly mentioning that many of the border crashing aliens of other cultures were prone to crime? Statistics bear that out in spades, but Ryan sounded like a little Barack Jr at that point saying "that's not who we are." And went on in this case to publicly castigate Judge Moore. McConnell's made a number of public DJT critiques, and was not averse in the least in using the power of his Senate post to snatch possible victory from the jaws of certain defeat in the Alabama race for Senator. And on behalf of yet another lawyer of rabid liberal leanings in the person of Democrat Doug Jones no less. BTW, Doug Jones is a screaming abortion on demand supporter. But the continuing certain murder of millions of the unborn and newborn, pales against flimsily supported sexual innuendo I guess.

You couldn't make this stuff up if you wanted to. And yet even if it was the judge who signed the yearbook, that adds exactly nothing in support of Young's charge. Now, in Al Franken's case there is photographic evidence to support the news anchor in question's allegations. And in the case of John Conyers, no less than his own Deputy Chief of Staff declared on open air during an interview on the "Today Show," that Congressman Conyers had pursued her relentlessly for sex over time. Nothing has been offered up in the case of Judge Roy Moore other than a yearbook, with an unverified inscription which mentions or infers nothing about sex. That's a little bit too much a stretch if you ask me.

On the other hand, Roy Moore's record on the bench is exemplary, particularly distinguishing himself in most Christian eyes, by having stood on his own Christian principles to defend his refusal to remove a monument of the 10 Commandments from the grounds of the Alabama State SC, (Commandments upon which our system of law is based BTW, that is if anybody would happen to even still be interested in the law). The man forfeited his job as Chief Justice of Alabama in deference of his faith. It would have taken a strong Christian to make that kind of sacrifice. But it takes no sacrifice, or class, to execute judgment upon him bereft of due process. By all means, I would encourage everyone to line up on which ever side of this thing suits them best.
John 8:7 (KJV)
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.