[Motley]

^^ The founders were not disposed to address moral matters on which the Lord had already so eloquently clear. But I am confident if the founders could have foreseen the ridiculousness of this day in time, they would have spoken to the issue.

So the Constitution doesn't say anything about marriage being between a man/woman? Got it.

Off topic? You're the one who seemed eager to imply it was in the constitution, which it's clearly not. I highly doubt the founders would have imagined our society drifting to complete insanity like it has in this day and age.

I implied nothing. Hitter said the definition of marriage was clearly in the Constitution. I asked where. That's all. You want to get offended by everything that's fine, but I made no other arguments or implications.