[Frank Martin]

Bylaw 22-11 section 2 also states:

Games canceled by school administrations and forfeit fees paid before the first playing date do not count against records or limits.

So it seems reasonable to believe that it was indeed the principle for Tate’s creek that’s actions caused this. And BOTH coaches either agreed or agreed not to reschedule. Otherwise it would be a violation of the rules and bylaws of the KHSAA and the appropriate action o discussed above would have been in place. WHICH ITS NOT.

So no, HC’s Head Coach couldn’t have said we aren’t playing, at least without agreement. It was most likely the TC principle who made the decision.

**also granny, since It WAS made by administrators by mutual agreement without forfeit provisions being made, this game does NOT count against season limits for both teams, and a game with Pikeville could be legally scheduled and played!!! Good luck everyone

A WHOLE lot of ASSUMPTIONS from folks who WERE'NT standing THERE. As I STATED earlier (and no one seems to have read) and will STATE one final TIME it is possible THAT the HC coach was REITERATING what he WAS told BY someone ELSE.