[alfus21]

You are right, that is ironic. Why don't you answer this question Alfus, I have asked you this two or three times so far and you never answer. If Pikeville's opponents and Shelby Valleys opponents have teams scheduled that has 5 winning records. Did Pikeville which is usually one of the bottom teams in the region schedule up to Shelby Valleys schedule which is usually one of the top 3 teams in the region? Or did the regional powerhouse Shelby Valley schedule their season like Pikeville which isn't usually considered a top tier team?

I can't believe you're using the sympathy plea here with Pikeville not being a top tier team over the last few years.

They are the defending champions of the 59th, and as you have said many times only lost to the region champ by 3 last year.

The past means absolutely nothing. This season is this season. Not 3-5 years ago. It has nothing to do with that.

I honestly think Pikeville's schedule is much weaker than Shelby Valley's. Not so far of course, but from here on out there is no contest.

As for your 5 winning record argument. Some teams are 2-3 and some are 1-2. I'd make it a safe bet that some of these teams records will change by the end of the season wouldn't you?

I'm done arguing about the schedule. Have fun watching the PIT this weekend while Pikeville battles winless Wolfe County and Jenkins. Don't be looking ahead though to the Piarist game or you might have some trouble.

We'll see how important the scheduling between the two has been when they meet up in January.