Thread Rating:
11-04-2007, 09:03 PM
Since there weren't any WMDs, people need something to blame it on. The intelligence was there for an invasion based on WMDs and it was good enough to get votes from both sides of the aisle to allow the US to invade. Was it bad info? So it seems but IMO it is better not to have Sadam in control of Iraq, a country that a least once had WMDs and had used them on their own people. Also, I believe that with all the warnings that the US gave to Iraq, and all the time, it allowed Sadam to move the weapons so that he would look clean.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
![[-]](https://bluegrassrivals.com/forum/images/lifestyle/collapse.png)
Messages In This Thread
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by BFritz - 11-04-2007, 08:53 PM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by Beef - 11-04-2007, 09:03 PM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by BFritz - 11-05-2007, 12:25 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by vundy33 - 11-05-2007, 12:53 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by BFritz - 11-05-2007, 01:11 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by Beef - 11-05-2007, 02:26 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by TOMCAT06 - 11-05-2007, 10:06 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by Coach_Owens87 - 11-05-2007, 03:11 PM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by BFritz - 11-05-2007, 11:41 PM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by DevilsWin - 11-05-2007, 11:48 PM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by thecavemaster - 11-06-2007, 11:36 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by JCHS_EAGLE - 11-22-2007, 03:06 AM
Bush Invaded Iraq for oil - by ronald_reagan - 11-28-2007, 12:15 AM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
