Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are #1 vs. #4 Playoff Games Necessary?
#1
Only "4" #4 seeds were able to pull the upset of a #1 last night...

2A: Heath (4-6/1-3) 20 - Caldwell Co. (7-3/4-0) 7
5A: Montgomery Co. (7-3/1-3) 16 - Woodford Co. (8-2/4-0) 7
6A: Nelson Co. (4-6/2-2) 34 - Greenwood (5-5/3-1) 28 2OT
6A: Shelby Co. (6-4/0-3) 60 - Scott Co. (9-1/3-0) 56

Do you still think that #1 vs. #4 games are needed? Should there be a change? Maybe #1 seed gets a bye week during the opening round, while the #2 & #3 seeds play for the right to face #1?

Suggestions for change or leave it as it is? Let's hear it!

Do you like having teams within your district facing each other during the opening round? I bet Greenwood didn't. Despite being the 1st seed, they lost to Nelson County in during the regular season.
Messages In This Thread
Are #1 vs. #4 Playoff Games Necessary? - by jammin' jamey - 11-10-2007, 01:48 PM
Are #1 vs. #4 Playoff Games Necessary? - by EkyLb - 11-10-2007, 02:58 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)