[Batpuff]

:confused:

Felony wanton endangerment requires disregard for human life.. I don't think that anyone would ever say that a firecracker in a pocket would fit that criteria. And attempted arson requires that the intent was to burn a structure, and the ability to do so. A fire cracker wouldn't burn a structure, nor was it her intention. (hopefully, or else she road the short bus this morning, thinkin that a fire cracker would burn it down.)

I'm going out on a limb and saying she'll get slapped with some minor misdemeanors..

And then probably recieve nothing, especially if she's under 18.

Thats how it goes these days.

I hate to tell you but you are wrong, I have had cases like this and it doesnt matter if it was a firecracker or not it could have caused serious injury and she knew that she shouldnt have had it to start with not to say on school grounds, and yes firecrackers can burn a building down. And I said she could be charged with that depending on the situation, which we dont know because we wasnt there. She could be charged with a single count for everyone in the room as far as that goes as well by placing them in harms way. And i doubt she will just get a slap on the wrist. Too much crap like this in school these days.