[bigE]

Paintsville's stats were very legit. But I guess you were at every single game keeping stats. Maybe them having 4 or 5 players hitting over .400 is why they were 27-6 and ranked in the top 10 in the state...Just maybe but who knows. Since you are on the stats kick then maybe you should go to schools like P-Burg, Magoffin, and AC to teach them how to run a book. **** P-Burg had a kid hitting over .600 in the paper and when we played them he didn't touch it but I guess that is the benefit of having your father keeping stats. But to your first statement you are right, if you hit .400 it doesn't mean you are D-1.

your right i really didn't mean to single paintsville out on the stats thing, it wasn't my intention....magoffin was bad and there were quite a few others that were, i think magoffin, as bad as they were, had the top four hitters in the region on their team by the end of the year if that explains anything, all of them hitting over .400...all im saying is for that many people to be over .400 is just way too far fetched, thats like a baseketball team having their entire starting 5 averaging over 20 pts a game....you have to admit, as good of a game as it was in the district, paintsville didn't look that great at the plate, with the exception of a couple players....but i will admit i did think paintsville would have won anyway though....against good pitching paintsville struggled a little bit and thats why i question the stats, but to your defense their schedule was weak enough to where those stats might have been possible..