[The Guru]

Yes, the exclusions in BYlaw 6 do create an opportunity to litigate. Litigation costs the tax payer money.

The only person that has to see the positive is the parent. My whole point is that the decision should be the parents.

The parent's motives are none of the school's, coaches' or KHSAA's business.

Two questions come to mind.

1) Why would anyone want to punish the kid by making him sit out of sports?

2)Why would any coach want a kid to stay that did not want to stay?


I do not understand either position. Both are childish and vindictive.

We all should know that the reason for the KHSAA to regulate transfers is to try and stop recruiting. Personally, I think they should. And to do so, they have to set guidelines. Of course in guidelines, it does create problems with some just trying to do what is best for their kid. But the KHSAA cannot bend on these rules or they would be useless. Therefor with that in mind, we as parents have a decision to make. And that is, we either follow the guidelines and do the transfer accordingly, or transfer and have our son sit out for a year. That may be hard either finacialy, mentally or both, but it is simple.
In this case, if the family picks up and moves and then enrolls their kids there, then everything is fine.
But what people on here are saying is that this family has been building a log home and working on this farm for a long time and they don't think that this family will give up this dream home.