Thread Rating:
04-23-2008, 11:54 AM
I was reading the Playboy Forum in the February or March edition and I came across an intriguing article.
The write was flat out against the NFL's testing players for illeagal drug use. Said it was no buisness of the league's what a player does off the field. Then he said that if the league tests players and hold them to those standards then it should for all people employed by a team. All the way down to the people who sell tickets.
The way I look at it, is that playing in the NFl is a job. Other jobs require drug testing. So what is the difference between the NFL and say Walmart? Just because they are playing a sport? So I whole-heartdly disagree with that writer. I say test them every week.
What's your thoughts BGR?
The write was flat out against the NFL's testing players for illeagal drug use. Said it was no buisness of the league's what a player does off the field. Then he said that if the league tests players and hold them to those standards then it should for all people employed by a team. All the way down to the people who sell tickets.
The way I look at it, is that playing in the NFl is a job. Other jobs require drug testing. So what is the difference between the NFL and say Walmart? Just because they are playing a sport? So I whole-heartdly disagree with that writer. I say test them every week.
What's your thoughts BGR?
![[-]](https://bluegrassrivals.com/forum/images/lifestyle/collapse.png)
Messages In This Thread
NFL's drug policy - by Amun-Ra - 04-23-2008, 11:54 AM
NFL's drug policy - by RedSeal - 04-24-2008, 06:15 PM
NFL's drug policy - by bluegrassballa - 04-25-2008, 09:29 AM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
