[thecavemaster]

If Darwin's theory of evolution is completely correct then why do things exist strickingly similar now than they did thousands of years ago, also if evolution was true couldn't species still be evolving into new ones. I don't understand what is so "scientific" about a study that went completely against the scientific method and can not in my opinion be justified when it is argued against. The only thing said when you question Darwin's Theory is that you are uneducated, well I am quite educated and I just don't get it.

Explain (in brief) how Darwin's methods were so unscientific within his professional timeframe as to merit your scorn... Do you question parts of Darwin's work or the whole of it?