[thecavemaster]

Then I think the equal protection act should not be considered. Since I go by the Bible on this matter; the equal act would give them the right to marry, which would, in turn permit them to do the nasty acts in their homes, which would still be a sin. That's why I am against it. It is getting to the point that what should be normal (Man + Woman) is being turned to not normal & what shouldn't be normal (Man + Man) is being turned into normal.

The general grace of your god makes sun to shine on good and evil. Equal protection under the law works like that general grace in a democracy. You are free to hold the "nasty acts" view, of course, as part of your religious belief. You are not free to impose your beliefs to the denial of equal protection under the law in this democracy. Who said that "man and woman" is not normal? Who said that you have to think "man and man" is normal?