[Belfry0304]

I can give my opinion on this topic. But just remember if you don't agree with me I'm obviously from Belfry and friends with Thomas.

I think that Thomas is more versatile, obviously. If you want to talk about who's better, who's more dominant? It's Channing. But I think it's a whole lot easier for Fugate, he's naturally gifted with size. Size matters. Thomas has to bust it for everything he has. He's not a very big guy at all. Channing's fast, Tom's fast. They're both strong. Obviously Channing's probably stronger because he's bigger, but Thomas out-benches are whole offense line. If I'm not mistaken, last years too.

I don't think you can compare, until you put them both behind the same offensive lines. They're different players, one's a 6'3 250 (correct me if I'm wrong) back, the other's 5'11, 170.

I will say this as far as Thomas' heart. He took possibly the hardest hit I've seen since Doug Howard creamed a Prestonsburg back in the Vipperman. If Fugate took that same hit, I don't think he, or any running back in the mountains, held onto that pass.