[Hoot Gibson]

Ah, from your vaulted scientific viewpoint, firmly enhanced by the latest climatalogical statistics, you have concluded global warming as a man-made phenomenon is a hoax. Lungs? Living tissue. Filled with smoke, chemicals, etc. Atmosphere? Living ecosystem. Filled with smoke, chemicals. Don't worry about it. From a common sense viewpoint, a virtue often touted on here, it doesn't add up, Sir. It doesn't add up.

As many proponents of the global warming hoax so often do, you have resorted to tossing red herrings into the debate. Of course, anybody with a basic understanding or chemistry or biology knows that neither gas is toxic to humans, animals, or plants.

High concentrations of CO2 and/or methane in a confined space reduces the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere, which can lead to asphyxiation but the victim will die with a healthy set of lungs if they were healthy before death.

FYI, smoke and carbon monoxide are products of incomplete combustion, neither of which have anything to do with the debate over the global warming hoax.

Those of us who believe that the anthropogenic global warming theory is being promoted as mechanism for governments to exert more control over their citizens are generally not opposed to tightly regulating the emission of actual pollutants into the air and water.

Trying to paint opponents of the global warming hoax as anti-environmentalists is a cheap shot but then you already know that, don't you?