[Hoot Gibson]

I do not see what the problem is. Its just a state that is adopting a federal law that is already a law. The arguement should not be about the law since it is not new but who is supposed to enforce it. Apparently the feds wasn't able to enforce it so the state took over. I think we should applaud it. It takes the burden off from us to deal with their problems. The state who it affects will have the responsibility. They are more inform about its effects anyways. It seems that most arguements are coming due to a distrust of our law enforcement officers. That is just sad.

Is it not strange how the federal government twists state's arms to write laws to comply with unfunded mandates and ignore the Tenth Amendment in areas such as drug enforcement and environmental matters, yet go ballistic when a state decides to adopt and enforce federal immigration laws that the feds refuse to enforce themselves?