Thread Rating:
09-01-2012, 11:34 PM
4_real Wrote:^ who is kardashian?
[INDENT]"It's an indication, once again, how out of touch they really are, how distanced they have become from the people who make this country work. It's an indication of what they think the strong drawing power of the presidency is. He's becoming Barack Kardashian. I tell you, that's what he's becoming. He is becoming the male Kim Kardashian with this stuff, and it's been building. He is Celebrity of the United States; he is not the President. And he is actively, and his whole team's out there pushing this. So it's Barack Hussein Kardashian, is what he has become." Rush Limbaugh[/INDENT]
![[-]](https://bluegrassrivals.com/forum/images/lifestyle/collapse.png)
09-02-2012, 12:44 PM
Karl Kardashian, Bucky Kardashian, Barack Kardashian- take your choice. All indicate one who has "fame" but who has actually done nothing of value in life. Your boy fills the bill.
And, it has been over 17 hours since I requested that you Kardashianites give me two legitimate reason why a taxpayer should vote for Kardashian. So far, no answers.
How about just giving us taxpayers one reason why we should vote for an anti-Christian socialist?
Of course it is a trick question. The answer is that there is no reason for those who bankroll this country to vote for the savior of the takers.
And, it has been over 17 hours since I requested that you Kardashianites give me two legitimate reason why a taxpayer should vote for Kardashian. So far, no answers.
How about just giving us taxpayers one reason why we should vote for an anti-Christian socialist?
Of course it is a trick question. The answer is that there is no reason for those who bankroll this country to vote for the savior of the takers.
09-02-2012, 02:31 PM
4_real Wrote:ahh, u listen to rush...no wonder your ideals are moot.
Automatically dismissing the ideas of conservative voices says a lot about you. The view that they never know what their talking about or that they are right wing wacko's that would be better served in a sanitorium, are the default positions of the extreme left. So much for your professed contention that "I'm for what's best for the country."
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
09-02-2012, 02:55 PM
TheRealThing Wrote:Automatically dismissing the ideas of conservative voices says a lot about you. The view that they never know what their talking about or that they are right wing wacko's that would be better served in a sanitorium, are the default positions of the extreme left. So much for your professed contention that "I'm for what's best for the country."Your trying to reason with a person who needs multiple clone accounts because they are so ineffective making a logical post. You can dismiss anything that one of this guy's clones say and not worry about hurting his feelings. I would not be surprised if he is a moderator who should know better. There are no standards on this website. The quality has nosedived over the past few months.
09-02-2012, 03:10 PM
4_real Wrote:clone accounts? dude why you gotta hate anyone who disagrees with you? STICK TO THE TOPIC and stop attacking spelling and grammar..:hilarious: That was a quick like by WC23. He never seems to be too far away to answer the call of a clone in distress.
09-02-2012, 03:12 PM
How ironic that Jersey Shore announces its final season two months before the election.
09-02-2012, 03:17 PM
Hoot Gibson Wrote::hilarious: That was a quick like by WC23. He never seems to be too far away to answer the call of a clone in distress.
Clone
I love it. YOur So dazed in your right wing anti obama stance that you think that we have to make clones. You realize that he is going to win the election right? And when the world does not fall down and america continues to move forward i hope you are able to move on with your life. Because if romney does win, ill sure move on with mine.
09-02-2012, 03:23 PM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:Clone
There's only one thing profoundly wrong with this post. If Obama wins (and I sincerely doubt he will) how you go on with your life will no longer be totally your choice. He's said he will be making a lot of those choices for you. However, if Romney wins, you'll likely get to continue on in the fashion you're used to. If you vote for Obama it will be a vote for loss of freedom. Have you even bothered to be honest with yourself about all the regulations pouring out of DC with much more of the same waiting in the wings should O be reelected? Your talking about cutting your own throat here.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
09-02-2012, 03:26 PM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:CloneYou're not fooling anybody, WC. I know that you believe that it is quite a mental feat for somebody to create clone accounts and pat themselves on the back, but it's not. I would be much more impressed if you could make an articulate case for a second Obama term. You can't.
09-02-2012, 03:28 PM
TheRealThing Wrote:There's only one thing profoundly wrong with this post. If Obama wins (and I sincerely doubt he will) how you go on with your life will no longer be totally your choice. He's said he will be making a lot of those choices for you. However, if Romney wins, you'll likely get to continue on in the fashion you're used to. If you vote for Obama it will be a vote for loss of freedom. Have you even bothered to be honest with yourself about all the regulations pouring out of DC with much more of the same waiting in the wings should O be reelected? Your talking about cutting your own throat here.
Does the Republicans not control congress?
09-02-2012, 03:30 PM
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You're not fooling anybody, WC. I know that you believe that it is quite a mental feat for somebody to create clone accounts and pat themselves on the back, but it's not. I would be much more impressed if you could make an articulate case for a second Obama term. You can't.
The clone assumptions is absurd first of all. I have never needed another account to state what i believe. No matter how many people disagree with it.
09-02-2012, 03:33 PM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:The clone assumptions is absurd first of all. I have never needed another account to state what i believe. No matter how many people disagree with it.:thatsfunn Stating what you believe and doing it in an articulate way that has a chance to persuade other people to your position are quite different animals. Make the case for an Obama second term. Convince us.
09-02-2012, 03:35 PM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:Does the Republicans not control congress?
Yeah, all the way up till they get to the cambers of the US Senate. There is where everything they try to do gets tabled. You remember, things like 7 budgets in the last 2 years and other small stuff like that? Harry Reid tables or refuses to allow House business to be brought up on the floor. The Senate is totally obstructing all legislation (except federal and state funding for emergencies and government) until after their imperious leader, BHO has his shot at the keys to the kingdom for the next four years.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
09-02-2012, 03:40 PM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:Does the Republicans not control congress?No, they does[sic] not control Congress. They control the House of Representatives. Democrats control the Senate (which is, FYI the second house of Congress), the place where good ideas and budgets go to die.
09-02-2012, 03:52 PM
Hoot Gibson Wrote:No, they does[sic] not control Congress. They control the House of Representatives. Democrats control the Senate (which is, FYI the second house of Congress), the place where good ideas and budgets go to die.
LOL, favorite Reid Pelosi threat, "it's DOA!"
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
09-02-2012, 05:35 PM
I f he does this country is done. Mark it down
09-02-2012, 05:47 PM
Benchwarmer Wrote:I f he does this country is done. Mark it downWe survived Bush2, we will survive Obama.
09-02-2012, 10:04 PM
TheRealVille Wrote:We survived Bush2, we will survive Obama.
Good point about Bush 2. But, I was wondering. Wouldn't surviving Bush 2's 8 year 5 trillion dollar rise in debt, be easier to survive than Obama's (2nd term projected) 8 year 12.4 trillion dollar rise in debt? I mean, he is spending money more than twice as fast as Bush did.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
09-03-2012, 12:07 AM
Wildcatk23 Wrote:Does the Republicans not control congress?
Your lack of knowledge probably explains why your posts are so immaterial. No, Wildcat23, the Republicans do not control Congress. They control the House of Representatives. Congress is made up the House of Representatives and the Senate. The latter is controlled by your boys and girls.
And, your grammar isn't anything to brag about either.
09-03-2012, 12:11 AM
It is now well over 27 hours since I asked the Kardashian people to give taxpayers two legitimate reasons to vote for their boy. Earlier today, I dropped the solicited (as in Sandra Fluke) reasons from two to one. Still nothing has been offered.
The truth is that there is no reason for a taxpayer to vote for Karl/Bucky/Barack Kardashian.
The truth is that there is no reason for a taxpayer to vote for Karl/Bucky/Barack Kardashian.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
