[TheRealThing]

"Joe Biden speaking at Sean Collier’s memorial service yesterday, ratcheted up the volume as he called the Tsarnaev brothers ”two twisted, perverted, cowardly, knock-off jihadis here in Boston.”
Under the tutelage of a friend known to the Tsarnaev family only as Misha, Tamerlan gave up boxing and stopped studying music, his family said. He began opposing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. He turned to websites and literature claiming that the CIA was behind the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and Jews controlled the world.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/...omes-fact/


May 1, 2013-
Three more Boston Marathon bombing suspects arrested. Two of the suspects, Azamat Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev, are U.S. students from Kazakhstan who were arrested days after the bombing on immigration violations. Those men were believed to have housed Dzhokhar on the day of and the day after the bombing.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...z2S4GP9c7t



Nothing like ending an investigation before it even starts, right Joe?
The word that sums up #1&2 of this administration, Majority Leader Reid and Minority Leader Pelosi? NAIVE This is why so many wanted to keep the younger Boston Marathon bomber out of liberal hands. It's hard to say how far the tentacles of Chechen terror are laced into the Boston area populace. All lawyered up now, precious information coming from the younger brother that may have saved thousands of lives could well be lost because the earth would have spun off it's axis if some terror suspect, an enemy combatant by any definition, wasn't Mirandized on time. What say you?

[TheRealVille]

Where did Joe insinuate anything other than the truth? He called the Tsarnaev brothers ”two twisted, perverted, cowardly, knock-off jihadis here in Boston.” What about that statement isn't true, or leads one to believe he was for ending any investigation about others involved?

[TheRealVille]

^I guess you are ok with the guy that broke the American taxi driver's jaw while ostrasizing him about being muslim? Even though, he was later found out to be an Iraq war veteran.

[TheRealThing]

Taxi drivers aren't my problem. Now, Jihad on American soil? That's getting my attention. Big picture still eludes you I see. And, if Joe had the mind of a rabbit he would have known two brothers on welfare couldn't finance enough fire power to kill and maim hundreds on the heels of a six month trip to Russia. Not to mention there was another attack on NY times square pending and already financed. Want to take a shot at explaining any of that?

[TheRealVille]

^ I never once said they were alone, and neither did Joe. He merely pointed out that the known parties responsible for carrying out the bombing were two, sick, twisted brothers. Show where he said anything other than that.


Sure you don't care about Americans with different religions than you. I'd bet you are fine with anybody ostracizing muslims, whether they are American, war veterans, or otherwise. Your panties show almost without fail.

[TheRealThing]

^ I never once said they were alone, and neither did Joe. He merely pointed out that the known parties responsible for carrying out the bombing were two, sick, twisted brothers. Show where he said anything other than that.


Sure you don't care about Americans with different religions than you. I'd bet you are fine with anybody ostracizing muslims, whether they are American, war veterans, or otherwise. Your panties show almost without fail.

Who cares what you think you said? I was speaking of Joe Biden, or are you running for president in 2016? Unbelievable. Everybody, far and wide, liberal and conservative have commented on the fact that this administration was ready to close the books on this case by the following Tuesday. And, that was exactly what Joe was alluding to when he summed the matter up with this comment. Two brothers, case closed.

[TheRealVille]

Who cares what you think you said? I was speaking of Joe Biden, or are you running for president in 2016? Unbelievable. Everybody, far and wide, liberal and conservative have commented on the fact that this administration was ready to close the books on this case by the following Tuesday. And, that was exactly what Joe was alluding to when he summed the matter up with this comment. Two brothers, case closed.

You asked the question on whether I want to take a shot at it. I was just letting you know I had never said they were alone. Until you come up with proof Joe was meaning it was only those two, you'd be better served to hush about it, or continue to look ignorant. Joe never once said he thought it was only those two. Where did Joe say "two brothers, case closed"? Can you read minds now, or this more of you making stuff up?

[Wildcatk23]

Wow? How does one interpret that to him closing te case? Sounds like he was just calling then as they was.


Wow. Just wow.

[TheRealThing]

You asked the question on whether I want to take a shot at it. I was just letting you know I had never said they were alone. Until you come up with proof Joe was meaning it was only those two, you'd be better served to hush about it, or continue to look ignorant. Joe never once said he thought it was only those two. Where did Joe say "two brothers, case closed"? Can you read minds now, or this more of you making stuff up?

This is for both you and Wildcat.

David Sirota of salon.com wrote: April 16, 2013 Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American

“White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues."
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hop..._american/



All the liberals would have desperately loved to have hung this thing on a white conservative. Preferably one with solid ties to the Tea Party or at least a registered republican. There was enough talk online ala David Sirota and other media outlets speculating the brothers acted alone, Lone Wolves, was the term, so as to provide enough 'surf' to last a good long time. The administration put out that they thought the brothers acted alone. And the administration put out that the attacks at Benghazi took place because of an insensitive video entitled "Innocence of Muslims". Are your memories that short?

[TheRealVille]

This is for both you and Wildcat.

David Sirota of salon.com wrote: April 16, 2013 Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American

“White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues."
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hop..._american/



All the liberals would have desperately loved to have hung this thing on a white conservative. Preferably one with solid ties to the Tea Party or at least a registered republican. There was enough talk online ala David Sirota and other media outlets speculating the brothers acted alone, Lone Wolves, was the term, so as to provide enough 'surf' to last a good long time. The administration put out that they thought the brothers acted alone. And the administration put out that the attacks at Benghazi took place because of an insensitive video entitled "Innocence of Muslims". Are your memories that short?

What does this have to do with Biden, or the President? This guy is who? Why not post the whole article, to let others see the context of the speaker? Your bias is showing.

[TheRealVille]

From TRT's link. Anybody that can read can understand the context. TRT's partial posting just more proves how a lot of conservatives operate.

As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.

Likewise, in the context of terrorist attacks, such privilege means white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters. Meanwhile, non-white or developing-world terrorism suspects are often reflexively portrayed as representative of larger conspiracies, ideologies and religions that must be dealt with as systemic threats — the kind potentially requiring everything from law enforcement action to military operations to civil liberties legislation to foreign policy shifts.

“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

To know that’s true is to simply consider how America reacts to different kinds of terrorism.

Though FBI data show fewer terrorist plots involving Muslims than terrorist plots involving non-Muslims, America has mobilized a full-on war effort exclusively against the prospect of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, the moniker “War on Terrorism” has come to specifically mean “War on Islamic Terrorism,” involving everything from new laws like the Patriot Act, to a new torture regime, to new federal agencies like the Transportation Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security, to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to mass surveillance of Muslim communities.

By contrast, even though America has seen a consistent barrage of attacks from domestic non-Islamic terrorists, the privilege and double standards baked into our national security ideologies means those attacks have resulted in no systemic action of the scope marshaled against foreign terrorists. In fact, it has been quite the opposite — according to Darryl Johnson, the senior domestic terrorism analyst at the Department of Homeland Security, the conservative movement backlash to merely reporting the rising threat of such domestic terrorism resulted in DHS seriously curtailing its initiatives against that particular threat. (Irony alert: When it comes specifically to fighting white non-Muslim domestic terrorists, the right seems to now support the very doctrine it criticized Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry for articulating — the doctrine that sees fighting terrorism as primarily “an intelligence-gathering, law-enforcement, public-diplomacy effort” and not something more systemic.)

Enter the Boston bombing. Coming at the very moment the U.S. government is planning to withdraw from Afghanistan, considering cuts to the Pentagon budget, discussing civil liberties principles and debating landmark immigration legislation, the attack could easily become the fulcrum of all of those contentious policy debates — that is, depending on the demographic profile of the assailant.

If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates. Put another way, white privilege will work to not only insulate whites from collective blame, but also to insulate the political debate from any fallout from the attack.

It will probably be much different if the bomber ends up being a Muslim and/or a foreigner from the developing world. As we know from our own history, when those kind of individuals break laws in such a high-profile way, America often cites them as both proof that entire demographic groups must be targeted, and that therefore a more systemic response is warranted. At that point, it’s easy to imagine conservatives citing Boston as a reason to block immigration reform defense spending cuts and the Afghan War withdrawal and to further expand surveillance and other encroachments on civil liberties.

If that sounds hard to believe, just look at yesterday’s comments by right-wing radio host Laura Ingraham, whose talking points often become Republican Party doctrine. Though authorities haven’t even identified a suspect in the Boston attack, she (like other conservatives) seems to already assume the assailant is foreign, and is consequently citing the attack as rationale to slam the immigration reform bill.

The same Laura Ingraham, of course, was one of the leading voices criticizing the Department of Homeland Security for daring to even report on right-wing domestic terrorism. In that sense, she perfectly embodies the double standard that, more than anything, will determine the long-term political impact of the Boston bombing.

[TheRealThing]

From TRT's link. Anybody that can read can understand the context.

That evidently must leave you out then. The context is these bozos are in a state of denial about the source of world terror and terror organizations, saying those of the "white privilege" crowd are sort of lurking around and waiting for a good reason to bomb some poor Arabs off the map.

[TheRealVille]

The "muslim taxi driver" is a classic example of what the article is about. People like TRT are the cabby's customers.

[TheRealThing]

The "muslim taxi driver" is a classic example of what the article is about. People like TRT are the cabby's customers.

People like TRV are like Patches O'Houlihan's customers. Dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge!

[TheRealVille]

That evidently must leave you out then. The context is these bozos are in a state of denial about the source of world terror and terror organizations, saying those of the "white privilege" crowd are sort of lurking around and waiting for a good reason to bomb some poor Arabs off the map.

Not even close to the context. It is saying that white people will profile middle eastern people, but if it were the other way around, nothing would be said concerning white terrorists. It says that more terrorist attacks are committed by whites, yet the first fingers are pointed at middle eastern people by whites. Can you even absorb context, or is your bias that strong?

[TheRealVille]

What does the link have to do with your lying Biden claims? You trying to divert away from your lies, or mind reading abilities?

[TheRealThing]

Not even close to the context. It is saying that white people will profile middle eastern people, but if it were the other way around, nothing would be said concerning white terrorists. It says that more terrorist attacks are committed by whites, yet the first fingers are pointed at middle eastern people by whites. Can you even absorb context, or is your bias that strong?

Tell you what. You go and think about that for a while and maybe you'll understand after enough time that you just said the same thing I did.

[TheRealVille]

Tell you what. You go and think about that for a while and maybe you'll understand after enough time that you just said the same thing I did.

No, you were trying to take what he said out of context, and say that liberals should hope the terrorists are white. That's not what he was saying. He was pointing to the double standard whites have when it comes to terrorists, quickly pointing to one type of people, while ignoring that most terrorists are white. He was pointing out the fact that people exactly like you are quick to profile terrorists, until they end up being white(Sandy Hook), then when it turns out they are white, you clam up, and look for excuses. You were saying no such thing.

[RunItUpTheGut]

Its easy to confuse TRT.
Biden doesnt make logical statements.
For all the years Bush was bashed for being dumb and or stupid, biden sure does make him look like a very smart human being.....

And noone can argue with that.

[TheRealThing]

Its easy to confuse TRT.
Biden doesnt make logical statements.
For all the years Bush was bashed for being dumb and or stupid, biden sure does make him look like a very smart human being.....

And noone can argue with that.

Sure, I'll give you that. Biden has managed to eclipse the "potatoe" incident of Dan Quayle.

[TheRealThing]

No, you were trying to take what he said out of context, and say that liberals should hope the terrorists are white. That's not what he was saying. He was pointing to the double standard whites have when it comes to terrorists, quickly pointing to one type of people, while ignoring that most terrorists are white. He was pointing out the fact that people exactly like you are quick to profile terrorists, until they end up being white(Sandy Hook), then when it turns out they are white, you clam up, and look for excuses. You were saying no such thing.

Most terrorists are not white, and that is exactly what I meant when I said liberals were trying to paint everybody but themselves as wanting to bomb responsible parties into the stone age. You really trying to defend David Sirota's article? Heck, even Alan Combes wouldn't touch that one. I also said and as was splashed all over the news, that liberals had decided for the most part that the two brothers were lone wolves, who acted alone and were not connected to any terror group. That leap to conclusion flies in the face of the facts. The sophistication of the explosive devices they built, the manner in which they were detonated, the cost of the devices reportedly was about $200dollars each for about 12 bombs that were discovered. They were living off our tax dollars on welfare, shocker. Where did the money come from to buy all that stuff? That doesn't include the cost of the guns they had or the 6 month trip to Russia.

Now, to address your claim of my intolerance. Please do put me down for thinking that 99 out of a hundred terrorists are going to turn out to be of Arab descent. Do I think that all liberals would have liked it if the Boston bombings had been committed by white guys? I'd like to think otherwise but, after hearing folks like Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, Alan Combes and many other liberals speak out over the past couple weeks, it wouldn't surprise me. Do I distrust all Muslims? Nope. Do I distrust all radicalized Muslims? Yep.

BTW, when did you flip flop officially? You were feigning outrage and saying you expected the bombers to be Muslims at first. When did all that change?

[TheRealVille]

Most terrorists are not white, and that is exactly what I meant when I said liberals were trying to paint everybody but themselves as wanting to bomb responsible parties into the stone age. You really trying to defend David Sirota's article? Heck, even Alan Combes wouldn't touch that one. I also said and as was splashed all over the news, that liberals had decided for the most part that the two brothers were lone wolves, who acted alone and were not connected to any terror group. That leap to conclusion flies in the face of the facts. The sophistication of the explosive devices they built, the manner in which they were detonated, the cost of the devices reportedly was about $200dollars each for about 12 bombs that were discovered. They were living off our tax dollars on welfare, shocker. Where did the money come from to buy all that stuff? That doesn't include the cost of the guns they had or the 6 month trip to Russia.

Now, to address your claim of my intolerance. Please do put me down for thinking that 99 out of a hundred terrorists are going to turn out to be of Arab descent. Do I think that all liberals would have liked it if the Boston bombings had been committed by white guys? I'd like to think otherwise but, after hearing folks like Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, Alan Combes and many other liberals speak out over the past couple weeks, it wouldn't surprise me. Do I distrust all Muslims? Nope. Do I distrust all radicalized Muslims? Yep.

BTW, when did you flip flop officially? You were feigning outrage and saying you expected the bombers to be Muslims at first. When did all that change?

No feigning outrage. I did expect them to be Arab. And, I do want them to die for their actions. One down, one to go. That doesn't change facts. A bomb is not the only weapon that can be used by terrorist. A gun in the hands of a mass murderer is also a terrorist weapon. Yes, more people have been in mass killings in America by whites than arabs, or than anyone else. That's fact.

I've never flip flopped on the issue, I just called out your lies about what Joe actually said, and what you said he said.

[TheRealVille]

^Non muslim terror plots since 9/11. I don't give a squat who causes terror, they should be killed.

Yet as a January 2011 terrorism statistics report — compiled using publicly available data from the FBI and other crime agencies — from the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) shows, terrorism by Muslim Americans has only accounted for a minority of terror plots since 9/11. Since the attacks on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, Muslims have been involved in 45 domestic terrorist plots. Meanwhile, non-Muslims have been involved in 80 terrorist plots.
In fact, right-wing extremist and white supremacist attacks plots alone outnumber plots by Muslims, with both groups being involved in 63 terror plots, 18 more plots than Muslim Americans have been involved in. Here is a breakdown of attacks by group, along with a few examples of plots by some of these groups:

Anti-Government/Anti-Tax Extremists: There have been 36 plots by right-wing extremists since 9/11. These attacks include Joseph Stack’s suicide attack on a Texas IRS building and Joshua Cartwright, who became enraged after the election of Barack Obama and “believed that the US Government was conspiring against him.”
KKK/NeoNazi/White Supremacist: There have been 27 plots by white supremacists since 9/11. These attacks include a 2004 letter bombing of the Arizona Office of Diversity and Dialogue that injured three employees.
Unknown/Miscellaneous: There were five attacks that federal crime officials did not categorize.
Christian Extremists/Anti-Abortion: There were three attacks by anti-abortion extremists and Christian extremists. The killing of abortion provider George Tiller is the most prominent of these attacks.
Black Supremacist Cults: There were two plots by black supremacist cults.
Jewish Extremists: There were two plots by Jewish extremists. The most prominent of these was a plot by Robert Goldstein to attack a local Islamic center with home made C4 and other explosives.
Extreme Anti-Immigrant: There were two plots by anti-immigrant extremists. One of these was the attack by Shawn Forde, who murdered a Queens deli clerk and was motivated by racist and anti-immigrant feelings.
Anti-Jewish: There was one plot by an anti-Semitic extremist. Norman Leboon made anti-Semitic threats against Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA).
Anarchist: There was a single plot by an anarchist. Joseph D. Konopka “wreaked havoc in 13 counties by setting fires, disrupting radio and television broadcasts, disabling an air traffic control system, selling counterfeit software, and damaging the computer system of an Internet service provider.”

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/0...errorists/

[TheRealThing]

^Non muslim terror plots since 9/11. I don't give a squat who causes terror, they should be killed.




http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/0...errorists/

You sure you're not a girl? Circular logic is one thing, but your attention span isn't even dependable enough to call spotty. You're going on about something I don't disagree about. All terrorists should get what they've got coming and that includes your hero's buddies like Bill Ayers, in whose living room Barry's political career was launched. And who still advises the pres on matters (I'd hate to think what kind) to this day. Haven't heard you say the first word about that.

As I have mentioned in the other thread. My worry is how many of the millions of Muslims we have imported are going to turn out the same way the Tsarnaev brothers did. The report your left wing site references was done by the Muslim public affairs council and added 'color' to the statistical data. Not likely to be completely nonbiased now are they? I hear people from C.A.R.E. and other representatives of Islam get up all the time and state that there is no real threat from Islamic terror even in the wake of the World Trade Center towers having been laid waste.

Likely the definition of terror had to be broadened to make the list of right wing offenders look more impressive. I wonder if the Occupy Wall Street, would-be-bridge-busters were on that list? Everybody knows one can use statistics to say anything and this is no different. Muslims are shaking the world right now with their terror attacks. The reason they do it, though ignored by liberals, is plain. They want to set up the Caliphate. Nobody is going to be nice enough to them so as to stem the tide of terror until that goal is accomplished. Which, means non-Muslim societies must go.

Now, you'd like to boil all that down to who's right and wrong between the two of us. I on the other hand believe the emergence of world terror is evidence of the end of time. I believe things will get worse, not better. And yet, in spite of the inevitable march of prophetic events to that end, we should be busy vetting those who are here on visa's or green cards and we should limit immigrants coming here according to the dictates of Marco Rubio's immigration legislation. That's only prudent.

In the thread starter I pointed out that Biden called the Bomb Brothers "Knock-off Jihadis." Basically big boy wannbes. The lone wolf theory was pushed from the outset as any honest person would freely admit. And I believe his statement bears out that Biden was lining up on the lone wolf side. The lone wolf scenario has not been shown to be true in this case, nor is it likely. More likely they do have some kind of tie to a terror group somewhere and that's how they got funded and trained. Liberals write articles like the one you reference all the time because they can't accept reality and believe liberalism will prevail over the will of the Islamist, who lives to see the Caliphate become reality. The libs are so used to believing what ever floats around in that reality stew between their ears, to them, that seems entirely plausible. I don't agree. These guys fly jet liners through skyscrapers, detonate vest bombs, shoe bombs and explosive underwear for crying out loud. They use innocent children as shields and train them to become suicide bombers. They're not going to be bought off and they're never going to accept western civilization's ideals as their own.

All the stats and rationalizations you can put forth would not change what we are looking at these days with regard to radical Islamists and their bent for mayhem and Jihad. Are there weirdo white supremists out there in the hills stockpiling arms and supplies. No doubt and they must be dealt with, the sooner the better. To say that conservatives are ok with those guys is baseless liberal propaganda.

[outdoorsman43]

No feigning outrage. I did expect them to be Arab. And, I do want them to die for their actions. One down, one to go. That doesn't change facts. A bomb is not the only weapon that can be used by terrorist. A gun in the hands of a mass murderer is also a terrorist weapon. Yes, more people have been in mass killings in America by whites than arabs, or than anyone else. That's fact.

I've never flip flopped on the issue, I just called out your lies about what Joe actually said, and what you said he said.

Could that possibly have anything to do with more white people living in America than Arabs or anyone else? :eyeroll:

[nky]

I believe most mass killings in this country are done by someone in a minority category not white

[TheRealVille]

I believe most mass killings in this country are done by someone in a minority category not white

Check out mass murder stats.

[nky]

^ most committed by a minority group

[TheRealVille]

^ most committed by a minority group

More mass murderers are white than anything else. It's a fact we can't hide from.
http://bossip.com/698648/race-matters-st...ial-group/
http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-po...-white-men

[outdoorsman43]

More mass murderers are white than anything else. It's a fact we can't hide from.
http://bossip.com/698648/race-matters-st...ial-group/
http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-po...-white-men

Check the population density of white's to any other ethnicity. There are far more whites. That is a fact that is, well....common sense. So of course there are going to be more mass murders by whites.

We would have a lot less Arabic mass murders if we just....do I even need to say it?