[Pick6]

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...lth-sexist

[Bob Seger]

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...lth-sexist

And Bill Clinton says that the phrase "Make America Great Again" is racist too...(unless he is the one sayin it)

Desperation from the left, with nothing of substance to come back with, is what you are seeing Pick.


Of course, there is no doubt that The Urban Cowboy will agree on both counts.

[TheRealThing]

And Bill Clinton says that the phrase "Make America Great Again" is racist too...(unless he is the one sayin it)

Desperation from the left, with nothing of substance to come back with, is what you are seeing Pick.


Of course, there is no doubt that The Urban Cowboy will agree on both counts.

Watch as Clinton collapses into the arms of her 'sexist' security team members;

CLICK ON VIDEO LINK



To give you an idea just how tight media reporting for the Clinton campaign really is, is, here we are days after the collapsing event and there have been as yet barely 13 thousand hits on the youtube link.

[The Urban Sombrero]

Watch as Clinton collapses into the arms of her 'sexist' security team members;

CLICK ON VIDEO LINK



To give you an idea just how tight media reporting for the Clinton campaign really is, is, here we are days after the collapsing event and there have been as yet barely 13 thousand hits on the youtube link.

If HRC is suffering from pneumonia, the heat, plus standing without moving for an extended period, plus general fatigue from the horribly long grind of a Presedential campaign? Eh, understandable. I'm glad she didn't throw up on any foreign dignitaries.

[The Urban Sombrero]

And Bill Clinton says that the phrase "Make America Great Again" is racist too...(unless he is the one sayin it)

Desperation from the left, with nothing of substance to come back with, is what you are seeing Pick.


Of course, there is no doubt that The Urban Cowboy will agree on both counts.

"Make America Great Again" is only racist if it means Mexicans and Blacks are why America isn't great at present. I simply reject the whole notion as campaign gimmickry not worth the hot air used to expel it through the larynx and out the mouth.

[Bob Seger]

"Make America Great Again" is only racist if it means Mexicans and Blacks are why America isn't great at present. I simply reject the whole notion as campaign gimmickry not worth the hot air used to expel it through the larynx and out the mouth.

Nah, what I think he meant is that we can be great again when the likes of The Urban Ahmed decide to leave the USA if he gets elected. You cant fault folks for dreamin big, can you?

[Bob Seger]

If HRC is suffering from pneumonia, the heat, plus standing without moving for an extended period, plus general fatigue from the horribly long grind of a Presedential campaign? Eh, understandable. I'm glad she didn't throw up on any foreign dignitaries.

The heat? 77 sweltering degrees?

Bill and Hillary cant even get on the same page when trying to spin the cover up. You'll believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the head of America's ultimate crime syndicate. You ever hear the phrase, "big dumb gullible guppy"?

[The Urban Sombrero]

The heat? 77 sweltering degrees?

Bill and Hillary cant even get on the same page when trying to spin the cover up. You'll believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the head of America's ultimate crime syndicate. You ever hear the phrase, "big dumb gullible guppy"?

"Donald only employed illegals to remain competitive as a businessman. You see, it's ok to compromise what you believe personally if the motive is money."

Spare the lectures on gullibility. You are not a credible source.

[TheRealThing]

"Donald only employed illegals to remain competitive as a businessman. You see, it's ok to compromise what you believe personally if the motive is money."

Spare the lectures on gullibility. You are not a credible source.

You can never seem to make a credible case for Hillary on any sort of merit. It's always an immediate pivot to one of the Trump lies being parroted by puppet and pundit. If it had been Trump's body seen collapsing onto the roadway, you can bet it would have been front line news and video continually for weeks to come. And before you say she did not hit the roadway, that is not the point. She, for whatever reason lost control of herself, and was free falling to the ground. The only thing that stopped it from being a decided mark leaving header, were the chunky guys with earphones. But that didn't stop you from making an unsubstantiated slur against Trump as your response now did it?

Does credibility mean anything, or is it just about winning at any cost for you Dems? You can no more back this charge up than I can fly. The rap sheet on Trump is the stuff of dirty politics.

> Lie #1 - Trump is supposedly some kind of misogynist. A charge of fiction dreamt up by the liars for hire there at the DNC. Like the lie they spun up about Romney, who was supposedly anti-women in the workplace because he had that infamous "binder" full of names of talented women whom he might be looking to employ. There are an awful lot of men out there who have shopped themselves around far and away more than Trump ever did. In 'The Donald's' case, we see a good looking guy who was rich all of his life, excelled in his studies in the Ivy League's Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and was a college athlete to boot. In fact, Wharton is ranked number 1 in the world in business education.

He has been wildly successful his whole adult life. Now where I come from, men who fared far less substantially that Mr Trump has, none the less have the girls standing in line to get a crack at them. What a total crock it is to suggest that a man with Mr Trump's limited past is a misogynist. He has conducted himself with grace in comparison to most men of power. I mean, the exploits of the Kennedy men alone, would make Trump look like the Pope, but I will throw Billy Boy in there anyway. Chappaquiddick ring a bell, maybe Marilyn Monroe, Monica Lewinski, Jennifer Flowers?

> Lie #2 - Trump is a racist. Really now? Trump's only sin is the desire to keep the people of this nation safe. And check me if I'm wrong, but is that not the commander-in-chief's main responsibility? Trump does not hate nor is he biased against the fodder of the media's much ballyhooed lies to the contrary, the Mexicans or the Muslims. Should they be allowed to cross our southern border without any sort of obeyance to the laws of this sovereign nation just because they can dream up some kind of hard luck story? Not in my book, nor the books of anybody with half a brain. It is the liberal who for some reason which escapes most, wants to see government use the law to run over the law in cases such as illegal immigration.

The what then is massive illegal immigration, the why is that it is an effort to change this nation's demographics, or allow it to go down for convenience sake and look the other way. Specifically, to change red states into blue states. Texas, Arizona, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and with Florida already leaning blue things are looking up for the Dems who are fighting hammer and tong to resist any kind of voter ID legislation. In fact the federal government has overridden states like North Carolina, which have recently passed voter ID legislation. :pondering: Wonder why?


> Lie #3 - Trump's base are a basketful of deplorables. Racists, sexist, xenophobes, homophobes, genophobes, Islamaphobes, you name it. Unfortunately, though I would like to think that the American right and especially the religious right will wake up to the realities of what lies right before their eyes and ears. I do not believe it will happen. I have spoken to a number of aged Church goers, and I can tell you that Christianity has somehow gotten itself hitched to the liberal Dem trolley. What a shame, and what an indictment against the Church, which is rife with compromise. The liberals love it, but there is nothing in God's Word one could use to condone it.

There are however, many millions of folks out there who have awakened, and I just pray to God that they are enough to stem the head of steam that the liberals obviously enjoy. Platform planks which feature accommodations for abortion on demand and gay rights, have cemented the Dems as the party of special interests. Somewhere they dropped their constitutional commitment to serve the common good, to become the champion of those deemed to be the socially oppressed.

[The Urban Sombrero]

You can never seem to make a credible case for Hillary on any sort of merit. It's always an immediate pivot to one of the Trump lies being parroted by puppet and pundit. If it had been Trump's body seen collapsing onto the roadway, you can bet it would have been front line news and video continually for weeks to come. And before you say she did not hit the roadway, that is not the point. She, for whatever reason lost control of herself, and was free falling to the ground. The only thing that stopped it from being a decided mark leaving header, were the chunky guys with earphones. But that didn't stop you from making an unsubstantiated slur against Trump as your response now did it?

Does credibility mean anything, or is it just about winning at any cost for you Dems? You can no more back this charge up than I can fly. The rap sheet on Trump is the stuff of dirty politics.

> Lie #1 - Trump is supposedly some kind of misogynist. A charge of fiction dreamt up by the liars for hire there at the DNC. Like the lie they spun up about Romney, who was supposedly anti-women in the workplace because he had that infamous "binder" full of names of talented women whom he might be looking to employ. There are an awful lot of men out there who have shopped themselves around far and away more than Trump ever did. In 'The Donald's' case, we see a good looking guy who was rich all of his life, excelled in his studies in the Ivy League's Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and was a college athlete to boot. In fact, Wharton is ranked number 1 in the world in business education.

He has been wildly successful his whole adult life. Now where I come from, men who fared far less substantially that Mr Trump has, none the less have the girls standing in line to get a crack at them. What a total crock it is to suggest that a man with Mr Trump's limited past is a misogynist. He has conducted himself with grace in comparison to most men of power. I mean, the exploits of the Kennedy men alone, would make Trump look like the Pope, but I will throw Billy Boy in there anyway. Chappaquiddick ring a bell, maybe Marilyn Monroe, Monica Lewinski, Jennifer Flowers?

> Lie #2 - Trump is a racist. Really now? Trump's only sin is the desire to keep the people of this nation safe. And check me if I'm wrong, but is that not the commander-in-chief's main responsibility? Trump does not hate nor is he biased against the fodder of the media's much ballyhooed lies to the contrary, the Mexicans or the Muslims. Should they be allowed to cross our southern border without any sort of obeyance to the laws of this sovereign nation just because they can dream up some kind of hard luck story? Not in my book, nor the books of anybody with half a brain. It is the liberal who for some reason which escapes most, wants to see government use the law to run over the law in cases such as illegal immigration.

The what then is massive illegal immigration, the why is that it is an effort to change this nation's demographics, or allow it to go down for convenience sake and look the other way. Specifically, to change red states into blue states. Texas, Arizona, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and with Florida already leaning blue things are looking up for the Dems who are fighting hammer and tong to resist any kind of voter ID legislation. In fact the federal government has overridden states like North Carolina, which have recently passed voter ID legislation. :pondering: Wonder why?


> Lie #3 - Trump's base are a basketful of deplorables. Racists, sexist, xenophobes, homophobes, genophobes, Islamaphobes, you name it. Unfortunately, though I would like to think that the American right and especially the religious right will wake up to the realities of what lies right before their eyes and ears. I do not believe it will happen. I have spoken to a number of aged Church goers, and I can tell you that Christianity has somehow gotten itself hitched to the liberal Dem trolley. What a shame, and what an indictment against the Church, which is rife with compromise. The liberals love it, but there is nothing in God's Word one could use to condone it.

There are however, many millions of folks out there who have awakened, and I just pray to God that they are enough to stem the head of steam that the liberals obviously enjoy. Platform planks which feature accommodations for abortion on demand and gay rights, have cemented the Dems as the party of special interests. Somewhere they dropped their constitutional commitment to serve the common good, to become the champion of those deemed to be the socially oppressed.

In the dialogue here, your points are straw men. I did not assert them. I do not believe Donald Trump to be racist or misogynist or xenophobic. You are correct that many on the left do believe those things. I was simply pointing out that Donald Trump is not a candidate without cause for concern and wonderings as well. Thus, the gullibility lecture was a bit much.

[Bob Seger]

]"Donald only employed illegals to remain competitive as a businessman. You see, it's ok to compromise what you believe personally if the motive is money."
[/B]
Spare the lectures on gullibility. You are not a credible source.

Uh, and that has what to do with anything we were talking about?:eyeroll:

Looks like you've finally went off the deep end.

[Bob Seger]

In the dialogue here, your points are straw men. I did not assert them. I do not believe Donald Trump to be racist or misogynist or xenophobic. You are correct that many on the left do believe those things. I was simply pointing out that Donald Trump is not a candidate without cause for concern and wonderings as well. Thus, the gullibility lecture was a bit much.

Must be the "word" of the day...


Let's see yesterday you were on the crayon kick, today it's straw man. Man 'O Man it's exciting times for sure, reading your electrifying vocabulary.

[TheRealThing]

In the dialogue here, your points are straw men. I did not assert them. I do not believe Donald Trump to be racist or misogynist or xenophobic. You are correct that many on the left do believe those things. I was simply pointing out that Donald Trump is not a candidate without cause for concern and wonderings as well. Thus, the gullibility lecture was a bit much.

No, they're not. You made a false accusation against Trump which you put forth as beyond dispute. I pointed out that falsehood, and since we were on the subject of your side's predilection for presenting lies as if they were the truth, I included a few more examples. You may be innocent of the slander, but your buddies and brethren aren't.

The video, as Seger pointed out, had nothing to do with Trump. It had to do with a Presidential candidate faltering in a way of which to my knowledge, was in every way as precedent setting as it was jaw dropping. The Hillary camp immediately offered up the excuse that she was just a little overheated and they got busted for it. Likewise, you sidestepped the validity of Seger's observation to immediately assail the person of Mr Trump. Face it, Hillary hit the bricks and it looked pretty bad.

If there is cause for concern and wonderings with the Trump candidacy, both the Dems and their dutiful media right arm have failed to articulate them. They like you have endeavored to spread gossip and innuendo to be sure, but there is no there, there. If they did in fact have something, you wouldn't see all the name calling in lieu of substance. It's really that simple.

[The Urban Sombrero]

No, they're not. You made a false accusation against Trump which you put forth as beyond dispute. I pointed out that falsehood, and since we were on the subject of your side's predilection for presenting lies as if they were the truth, I included a few more examples. You may be innocent of the slander, but your buddies and brethren aren't.

The video, as Seger pointed out, had nothing to do with Trump. It had to do with a Presidential candidate faltering in a way of which to my knowledge, was in every way as precedent setting as it was jaw dropping. The Hillary camp immediately offered up the excuse that she was just a little overheated and they got busted for it. Likewise, you sidestepped the validity of Seger's observation to immediately assail the person of Mr Trump. Face it, Hillary hit the bricks and it looked pretty bad.

If there is cause for concern and wonderings with the Trump candidacy, both the Dems and their dutiful media right arm have failed to articulate them. They like you have endeavored to spread gossip and innuendo to be sure, but there is no there, there. If they did in fact have something, you wouldn't see all the name calling in lieu of substance. It's really that simple.

Are you stating here that Trump did NOT use illegal immigrants in his construction projects. I want you on the record.

Hillary Clinton "went woozie," no question. Hillary has her secrecy; Donald has his bombast. "Take my word for it" is hardly evidence.

Trump practices boomerang campaigning. Get hit with the charge of offering no policy details only banal superficialties? Turn that around and say it of your opponent.

In my view, the SCOTUS is your mother lode. You are willing to dig after any lead to win this election. How is that different from my friends on the left?

"Oh, no, we take the high road." This is culture war politics. There is no high road. Only folk deluding themselves.

[TheRealThing]

Are you stating here that Trump did NOT use illegal immigrants in his construction projects. I want you on the record.

Hillary Clinton "went woozie," no question. Hillary has her secrecy; Donald has his bombast. "Take my word for it" is hardly evidence.

Trump practices boomerang campaigning. Get hit with the charge of offering no policy details only banal superficialties? Turn that around and say it of your opponent.

In my view, the SCOTUS is your mother lode. You are willing to dig after any lead to win this election. How is that different from my friends on the left?

"Oh, no, we take the high road." This is culture war politics. There is no high road. Only folk deluding themselves.

LOL, you the venerable Urban Sombrero want me on record huh? :please: Anything I write on this forum is on the record.

But wow, so much for anything resembling objectivity. First the illegal immigrants working for Trump. Trump writes the checks and demands the three things any well represented client would from a construction general contractor. On specification, on budget and on time. Whether it be high-rise or casino, all projects are accomplished by subcontractors who have bid with and are subservient to the general contractor. There are 16 separate architectural divisions which make up the total construction package. They are things like concrete foundations, structural steel, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and so on.

Because of the intricacies associated with any one of those divisions, subcontractors always specialize, while the general plays the role of organizer and traffic cop, and speaks on the authority of the client and the architect. On projects as complex as are typical for a Trump enterprise, the chain of command within the General Contractor's organization would be rather complex, involving front line supervisors all the way up to the Superintendent. Therefore, the norm would be to see a fairly high number of 'subs', all working at the same time. There is no way Trump went out and hired the many thousands of workmen who may have at any one time been technically in his employ. The subs do all of their own hiring, as does the General. Their pay checks have the name of the sub in question on them, not Donald J. Trump. You're not going to convince me that he actively solicited for illegals so that he could stay on budget on any jobs that may be in question. Especially in consideration of the fact that illegals tend to be much more numerous in places like Miami.

Sorry pal, but until you're tethered a little more substantially to the same good earth upon which I walk, I'll not be taking your word for anything more than what it obviously is, liberal talking points and revisionist rationalizations. And I don't need to dig after leads, I know the truth from the talking points, mostly because I've been paying attention as history has unfolded over the course of my life. I don't run to the DNC to get them to tell me what I should think about the stuff that happens in this world. Further, I balance what I see and hear against the Scriptures. If it's La-La lunacy, I recognize it, so you can tell yourself that your side of the argument has just as much merit as the conservative side does just to make yourself feel better. You'll never convince me with the shallow and circular logic of the left.

[The Urban Sombrero]

LOL, you the venerable Urban Sombrero want me on record huh? :please: Anything I write on this forum is on the record.

But wow, so much for anything resembling objectivity. First the illegal immigrants working for Trump. Trump writes the checks and demands the three things any well represented client would from a construction general contractor. On specification, on budget and on time. Whether it be high-rise or casino, all projects are accomplished by subcontractors who have bid with and are subservient to the general contractor. There are 16 separate architectural divisions which make up the total construction package. They are things like concrete foundations, structural steel, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and so on.

Because of the intricacies associated with any one of those divisions, subcontractors always specialize, while the general plays the role of organizer and traffic cop, and speaks on the authority of the client and the architect. On projects as complex as are typical for a Trump enterprise, the chain of command within the General Contractor's organization would be rather complex, involving front line supervisors all the way up to the Superintendent. Therefore, the norm would be to see a fairly high number of 'subs', all working at the same time. There is no way Trump went out and hired the many thousands of workmen who may have at any one time been technically in his employ. The subs do all of their own hiring, as does the General. Their pay checks have the name of the sub in question on them, not Donald J. Trump. You're not going to convince me that he actively solicited for illegals so that he could stay on budget on any jobs that may be in question. Especially in consideration of the fact that illegals tend to be much more numerous in places like Miami.

Sorry pal, but until you're tethered a little more substantially to the same good earth upon which I walk, I'll not be taking your word for anything more than what it obviously is, liberal talking points and revisionist rationalizations. And I don't need to dig after leads, I know the truth from the talking points, mostly because I've been paying attention as history has unfolded over the course of my life. I don't run to the DNC to get them to tell me what I should think about the stuff that happens in this world. Further, I balance what I see and hear against the Scriptures. If it's La-La lunacy, I recognize it, so you can tell yourself that your side of the argument has just as much merit as the conservative side does just to make yourself feel better. You'll never convince me with the shallow and circular logic of the left.

Dost thou artfully construct? Why, yes, thou dost. Donald Trump did not give a whit whether the folk building his hotels and casinos and golf courses were legals. He couldn't have cared less. You know it. I know it. Revisionist? You have to be good at it to maneuver around all the Trumpisms. In my view, it doesn't disqualify him for being President. The stakes are high. Winning is the only thing. That's big time politics.

Nobody knows the truth from the talking points. Social media and Internet journalism have so polluted the water that the pebble of quartz truth at the bottom is nigh impossible to see. In reality, HRC could be on death's door, and DJT could have cholesterol off the charts. I doubt the average citizen would know it.

On another note, I have yet to find a candidate for President yet since such things were calculated that, on the night of election were upside down in likeability and trustability. Unless something drastic happens, no matter who wins, he or she will be a first in that regard.

[TheRealThing]

Dost thou artfully construct? Why, yes, thou dost. Donald Trump did not give a whit whether the folk building his hotels and casinos and golf courses were legals. He couldn't have cared less. You know it. I know it. Revisionist? You have to be good at it to maneuver around all the Trumpisms. In my view, it doesn't disqualify him for being President. The stakes are high. Winning is the only thing. That's big time politics.

Nobody knows the truth from the talking points. Social media and Internet journalism have so polluted the water that the pebble of quartz truth at the bottom is nigh impossible to see. In reality, HRC could be on death's door, and DJT could have cholesterol off the charts. I doubt the average citizen would know it.

On another note, I have yet to find a candidate for President yet since such things were calculated that, on the night of election were upside down in likeability and trustability. Unless something drastic happens, no matter who wins, he or she will be a first in that regard.

You don't know if illegals were hired on Trump projects and neither do any of your kindred. If it could have been substantiated, not proven in a court of law mind you merely substantiated, then we'd have certainly heard of it before now. And frankly, if there is anything you and I both know, it's that just making the allegation is the stock-in-trade tactics of your side. Harry Reid stood of the floor of the Senate and said that Romney hadn't paid taxes in 10 years, and he knew it was bull when he said it. When later asked about having done such a thing, he just laughed it off saying of Romney "Well, he didn't get elected, now did he?"

Subcontractors must bid their way onto a project. They do so bidding against other contractors who have sharpened their pencils as much as they dare. It's no easy thing to outbid the others and the first question every contractor who wins a bid asks himself is, "Oh my gosh, what did I miss?" And to make the cheese even more binding, general contractors have to do their due diligence to make certain they've shopped the bids of their would be subordinates around enough to ensure they turn in the best price. If it were to come to pass that any sub failed to accomplish the work as promised, that means it falls to the general to find somebody else to do it right at his own expense.

That being the case and it is, no contractor with his financial life flashing before his eyes is about to let anybody tell him who he will hire to do the very work he's already scared he'll lose money doing anyway. Not only are all contractors closely scrutinized by their superiors, it's nothing for them to actually undergo a mid-job audit by the client to verify their ducks are in a row. The business matters of such a cutthroat industry dictate themselves, one cannot play fast and loose with any part of it and hope to survive to see the next project. Trump didn't hire illegal immigrants, the work was all under contract. If you understood what that means, you'd know what you said is very nearly impossible. And further, if Trump had coerced any sub to hire illegal workers they'd be blowing the whistle so fast it would make Trump's head spin in order to escape prosecution by the INS.

[The Urban Sombrero]

You don't know if illegals were hired on Trump projects and neither do any of your kindred. If it could have been substantiated, not proven in a court of law mind you merely substantiated, then we'd have certainly heard of it before now. And frankly, if there is anything you and I both know, it's that just making the allegation is the stock-in-trade tactics of your side. Harry Reid stood of the floor of the Senate and said that Romney hadn't paid taxes in 10 years, and he knew it was bull when he said it. When later asked about having done such a thing, he just laughed it off saying of Romney "Well, he didn't get elected, now did he?"

Subcontractors must bid their way onto a project. They do so bidding against other contractors who have sharpened their pencils as much as they dare. It's no easy thing to outbid the others and the first question every contractor who wins a bid asks himself is, "Oh my gosh, what did I miss?" And to make the cheese even more binding, general contractors have to do their due diligence to make certain they've shopped the bids of their would be subordinates around enough to ensure they turn in the best price. If it were to come to pass that any sub failed to accomplish the work as promised, that means it falls to the general to find somebody else to do it right at his own expense.

That being the case and it is, no contractor with his financial life flashing before his eyes is about to let anybody tell him who he will hire to do the very work he's already scared he'll lose money doing anyway. Not only are all contractors closely scrutinized by their superiors, it's nothing for them to actually undergo a mid-job audit by the client to verify their ducks are in a row. The business matters of such a cutthroat industry dictate themselves, one cannot play fast and loose with any part of it and hope to survive to see the next project. Trump didn't hire illegal immigrants, the work was all under contract. If you understood what that means, you'd know what you said is very nearly impossible. And further, if Trump had coerced any sub to hire illegal workers they'd be blowing the whistle so fast it would make Trump's head spin in order to escape prosecution by the INS.

I reassert what I actually said: Donald Trump did not give a whit whether or not illegal immigrants worked in the construction of his hotels, casinos, golf courses. Even if he personally handed each a check, it would not preclude me voting for him. I see it as a non-starter. For that matter, I don't care about his tax returns, as it has been clear to me for years that he inflates his wealth and is bombastic to the nth degree.

George W. Bush wins South Carolina because McCain fathered a black baby. It's politics. All that matters is winning. What is needed is easy deniability. So on and so forth. James Carville. Karl Rove. Different sides but same animal. It's dirty. It's nasty. The stakes are high.

[TheRealThing]

Reassertion noted and again, you don't have the first clue what you're talking about. There is zero proof, even proof that would meet the nearly invisible media standard of present day, that Trump hired illegal aliens just so he could save a few bucks. That wouldn't stop you from repeating it over and over again though, right?

You brought up McCain's supposed sexual dalliances providing yet another perfectly timed Segway into the headlines for the day. I seems former Secretary of State Collin Powell's a bit miffed with Hillary and her campaign. :biggrin: In fact, somebody hacked his email account and man, is there some juicy tidbits in there! (Stay tuned, because if Senator Grassley gets his way there will be much more to come in that area of interest) nicker:

Powell says Billy boy, ever the lady's man, is still at it. His voracious appetite for strange seemingly has no point of satiation it would seem, as Powell maintains Bill regularly entertains "Bimbos at his own house."

Ah yes, the gift that just keeps on giving. Today ol Bill was out campaigning for his wife. You remember, the one who he gives all those family man hugs to at every conceivable campaign intro and photo-op? Anyway, today he gets up and in his best good ol boy yuckety yuck, he laughs off Hillary's near unconscious header into the side of the van providing her transport. And in his patented and best, "I feel your pain" croak, he says she just had the flu, and what's the big deal? Millions of Americans get the flu every year.

Give me Trump any old day and twice on Sunday. I know there are a few things he has said that are iffy. The Apple iPhone being built in the USA for example. That's admittedly iffy. But honestly, if Obama would have said listen America. Vote me in office and I'll force ObamaCare on you, which owing to ledger sheet flatulence has no chance of ever being remotely revenue neutral so, it's gonna cost you dearly. And, I'll ram homosexual rights down your throats. And by the time I get through with my foreign policy shenanigans, there will most likely be a new world order to include a flaming Middle East, an ICBM capable North Korea, a nuclear Iran, NATO will shell-out, and Putin will regain much of the territory and power lost in the collapse of the USSR. I mean, how dangerous by comparison are the two men in real terms? Every time I see the beaming faces of Hillary's glassy eyed adherents applauding her campaign speeches, I wonder what they're actually cheering about? Beer and pizza after the show?

[The Urban Sombrero]

Reassertion noted and again, you don't have the first clue what you're talking about. There is zero proof, even proof that would meet the nearly invisible media standard of present day, that Trump hired illegal aliens just so he could save a few bucks. That wouldn't stop you from repeating it over and over again though, right?

You brought up McCain's supposed sexual dalliances providing yet another perfectly timed Segway into the headlines for the day. I seems former Secretary of State Collin Powell's a bit miffed with Hillary and her campaign. :biggrin: In fact, somebody hacked his email account and man, is there some juicy tidbits in there! (Stay tuned, because if Senator Grassley gets his way there will be much more to come in that area of interest) nicker:

Powell says Billy boy, ever the lady's man, is still at it. His voracious appetite for strange seemingly has no point of satiation it would seem, as Powell maintains Bill regularly entertains "Bimbos at his own house."

Ah yes, the gift that just keeps on giving. Today ol Bill was out campaigning for his wife. You remember, the one who he gives all those family man hugs to at every conceivable campaign intro and photo-op? Anyway, today he gets up and in his best good ol boy yuckety yuck, he laughs off Hillary's near unconscious header into the side of the van providing her transport. And in his patented and best, "I feel your pain" croak, he says she just had the flu, and what's the big deal? Millions of Americans get the flu every year.

Give me Trump any old day and twice on Sunday. I know there are a few things he has said that are iffy. The Apple iPhone being built in the USA for example. That's admittedly iffy. But honestly, if Obama would have said listen America. Vote me in office and I'll force ObamaCare on you, which owing to ledger sheet flatulence has no chance of ever being remotely revenue neutral so, it's gonna cost you dearly. And, I'll ram homosexual rights down your throats. And by the time I get through with my foreign policy shenanigans, there will most likely be a new world order to include a flaming Middle East, an ICBM capable North Korea, a nuclear Iran, NATO will shell-out, and Putin will regain much of the territory and power lost in the collapse of the USSR. I mean, how dangerous by comparison are the two men in real terms? Every time I see the beaming faces of Hillary's glassy eyed adherents applauding her campaign speeches, I wonder what they're actually cheering about? Beer and pizza after the show?

Glassy-eyed adherency is not the domain of just one set of partisans. Never has been. Never will be.

Colin Powell says Bill Clinton is still a womanizer. So what? Donald Trump has an injection-aided testosterone level of 441. So what? Dirty laundry and ratings. Ratings and dirty laundry. Advertising dollars.

Russia has oil revenue. Sanctions would be effective minimally. If Putin wants Romania (he doesn't), let him bankrupt his country again chasing the illusion of rivalry with the US.

[TheRealThing]

Glassy-eyed adherency is not the domain of just one set of partisans. Never has been. Never will be.

Colin Powell says Bill Clinton is still a womanizer. So what? Donald Trump has an injection-aided testosterone level of 441. So what? Dirty laundry and ratings. Ratings and dirty laundry. Advertising dollars.

Russia has oil revenue. Sanctions would be effective minimally. If Putin wants Romania (he doesn't), let him bankrupt his country again chasing the illusion of rivalry with the US.

> Oh yes it is. Dem supporters believe the government giveth and refuse to recognize to do so means it must taketh from everybody else to so do. Conservatives know better, always have, always will.

> Goes to integrity and character your honor. We Americans cannot dictate such things of our neighbors, but we should demand them from our leaders.

> Liberal blather to which you attach the readily recognizable DNC bob and weave that does not merit another wasted response. And yet I will venture a point not made in the post you ducked. In absence of military deterrent in the hands of men of mettle willing to use them, one gets run over. Thus I give you the Obama legacy.

[The Urban Sombrero]

> Oh yes it is. Dem supporters believe the government giveth and refuse to recognize to do so means it must taketh from everybody else to so do. Conservatives know better, always have, always will.

> Goes to integrity and character your honor. We Americans cannot dictate such things of our neighbors, but we should demand them from our leaders.

> Liberal blather to which you attach the readily recognizable DNC bob and weave that does not merit another wasted response. And yet I will venture a point not made in the post you ducked. In absence of military deterrent in the hands of men of mettle willing to use them, one gets run over. Thus I give you the Obama legacy.

What hawkish response would you have advised? Boots on the ground when the folks in the region voted to join Russia, and, thereby, truly revisit Vietnam?

Four Iranian boats approach a US Navy cruiser, but not close enough as to be viewed as threatening by the ship's commander. What is your hawkish response? Create an international incident when a gnat bites your backside?

If Colin Powell sees Bill Clinton at a Beltway event, and women give him attention, that becomes "Bimbogate"? DJT has several ex-wives. Does that similarly bother you?

"All hail hawks" put a lot of bodies in bags in Iraq. Despite all your "if only he had a pair" disrespect of our twice-elected President, you have only guessed about how outcomes in Iraq, in Afghanistan might have been different. Lincoln implored that the dead of both sides at Gettysburg "not die in vain." Our leaders should make policy and send troops with that in mind.

[TheRealThing]

What hawkish response would you have advised? Boots on the ground when the folks in the region voted to join Russia, and, thereby, truly revisit Vietnam?

Four Iranian boats approach a US Navy cruiser, but not close enough as to be viewed as threatening by the ship's commander. What is your hawkish response? Create an international incident when a gnat bites your backside?

If Colin Powell sees Bill Clinton at a Beltway event, and women give him attention, that becomes "Bimbogate"? DJT has several ex-wives. Does that similarly bother you?

"All hail hawks" put a lot of bodies in bags in Iraq. Despite all your "if only he had a pair" disrespect of our twice-elected President, you have only guessed about how outcomes in Iraq, in Afghanistan might have been different. Lincoln implored that the dead of both sides at Gettysburg "not die in vain." Our leaders should make policy and send troops with that in mind.

A chin?