Thread Rating:
03-16-2012, 10:03 AM
Has anyone heard of any change to this? If not this bat is ILLEGAL.
[Image: http://www.cheapbaseballbatsonline.com/w...ll-Bat.jpg]
http://www.nfhs.org/uploadedFiles/NFHS_H...onmemo.pdf
[Image: http://www.cheapbaseballbatsonline.com/w...ll-Bat.jpg]
http://www.nfhs.org/uploadedFiles/NFHS_H...onmemo.pdf
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
âRelax, all right? Donât try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, theyâre fascist. Throw some ground balls â itâs more democratic.â
Crash Davis
03-16-2012, 01:00 PM
Yeah OTH, I did hear about this a couple of weeks ago.
03-16-2012, 02:37 PM
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
âRelax, all right? Donât try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, theyâre fascist. Throw some ground balls â itâs more democratic.â
Crash Davis
03-16-2012, 03:52 PM
LCC played Sullivan North TN. yesterday and they were using this bat. As a matter of fact they hit a HR that went at least 350yrds with this bat. It sounded like it had the "pop" of the old bats.
03-16-2012, 05:44 PM
To be clear, it's only the 33" bat that was pulled. The other sizes are still on the approved list
03-17-2012, 09:48 AM
^You are correct SD.
Hopefully everyone will read the Thread Title correctly......NOT....LOL.
Hopefully everyone will read the Thread Title correctly......NOT....LOL.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
âRelax, all right? Donât try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, theyâre fascist. Throw some ground balls â itâs more democratic.â
Crash Davis
03-17-2012, 01:42 PM
I read that Easton pushed to have these re-tested and a small number of these bats failed the test, so all have be de-cert..... I just can't believe that there is that much difference from one size to the next.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)