[TheRealThing]

President Clinton's quote was from when he was president. Guess he was the head chef on those book cooking plans:biglmao:

LOL, self delusion is the liberals closest friend. RV's response in the face of all those facts and quotes from Democrats no less, was merely a sort of capsulized review of a liberal political ad. :please: An ad in which Alison looks very stiff and uncomfortable in what looked to be a coached shooter's stance but one which, none the less, impressed RV. At one point closing her left eye (couldn't see her right one) before she shot. Any body who shoots much, knows you don't close one eye when you're shooting. Additionally, I would suggest to Alison and all anti-gun liberals these two things. First, we who do shoot know when you're at a NRA rally, showing a crowd of hundreds a gun, you have to hold the darn thing up where it can be seen. Second, When ISIS converts are running the streets looking for a few heads to cut off before breakfast, like they are trying to do in Australia, how we Americans hold our guns will be a thing of marked interest to them.

Alison was 5 1/2 points down and sliding when last I checked. Cooked intel huh? And I guess RV, vector and tvtime came up with that one all by themselves? When intel is 'cooked', one can expect the intelligence community to come out swinging against those who do the cooking, in like manner to which we have seen in the Benghazi case but, which did not happen with regard to Iraq. All the cooking came from the Dems camp, as they are the ones who began talking up their cover story prior to the elections. Just like they have done and continue to do with the Benghazi deal and even to the point of giving themselves cover for ObamaCare that ALL of them voted for. But, here's the point. One can easily see the level of intellect to which the Dems direct their campaigns. In the absence of a credible campaign or audience to receive that campaign I guess, Alison, at the behest of her handlers, says Mitch doesn't know how to hold a gun. Wow! That's a big deal, nearly as thought provoking as this playgroundesque play on words somebody came up with; "TEAM SWITCH."

[TheRealVille]

President Clinton's quote was from when he was president. Guess he was the head chef on those book cooking plans:biglmao:

I notice you fail to provide links to your quotes. Are you hiding something?

[Harry Rex Vonner]

So,... going by his record, you could not get a jury to find him guilty of being a muslim. You sure you don't want to quote scripture after that foul mouthed post?

People who live in a fantasy world (President Hillary? Alison can shoot a gun?), often find the truth to be "foul mouthed". And, I will repeat that a civil jury would, after all the evidence is presented, find your little boy to be a Muslim.

For almost two months now I have tried to get you to post one, just one, true accomplishment of Little Lundergan (a/k/a Clueless Barbie) in her uneventful life. You continue to ignore the question. And you are right to do so. Clearly, her only "accomplishment" is that she claims to be married to someone who is invisible- the fictional character, Andy Lundergan.

[TheRealVille]

People who live in a fantasy world (President Hillary? Alison can shoot a gun?), often find the truth to be "foul mouthed". And, I will repeat that a civil jury would, after all the evidence is presented, find your little boy to be a Muslim.

For almost two months now I have tried to get you to post one, just one, true accomplishment of Little Lundergan (a/k/a Clueless Barbie) in her uneventful life. You continue to ignore the question. And you are right to do so. Clearly, her only "accomplishment" is that she claims to be married to someone who is invisible- the fictional character, Andy Lundergan.

She won Secretary of State, and her accomplishments have been stated in this forum, and google is full of information on her. As a business attorney before she was elected, she helped bring jobs to KY by helping businesses get opened, and on the right track to help KY's economy. Any accomplishment stated, you attribute it to high school age volunteering, with no evidence to back it up. You are clearly a partisan hack. You don't want an answer, because when they are given, you ignore it. I'm still interested in hearing how she has gained so much animosity from you. She has surely burnt you in court, or something?

[TheRealVille]

People who live in a fantasy world (President Hillary? Alison can shoot a gun?), often find the truth to be "foul mouthed". And, I will repeat that a civil jury would, after all the evidence is presented, find your little boy to be a Muslim.

For almost two months now I have tried to get you to post one, just one, true accomplishment of Little Lundergan (a/k/a Clueless Barbie) in her uneventful life. You continue to ignore the question. And you are right to do so. Clearly, her only "accomplishment" is that she claims to be married to someone who is invisible- the fictional character, Andy Lundergan.

Fantasy? I'd be willing to make a small, gentleman's wager of $100 with you, that if Hillary runs for President, she wins. You in?

FTR, anybody that shoots, knows Alison was shooting that shotgun properly, in the commercial. Watch the skeet explode every time. Reckon Mitch can handle a gun?

[YOUTUBE="Alison"]z7Pa16JPUlY[/YOUTUBE]
[Image: http://a1.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/imag...6kxnrq.jpg]

[Harry Rex Vonner]

Fantasy? I'd be willing to make a small, gentleman's wager of $100 with you, that if Hillary runs for President, she wins. You in?

FTR, anybody that shoots, knows Alison was shooting that shotgun properly, in the commercial. Watch the skeet explode every time. Reckon Mitch can handle a gun?

[YOUTUBE="Alison"]z7Pa16JPUlY[/YOUTUBE]
[Image: http://a1.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/imag...6kxnrq.jpg]

Well, she is clearly a puppet for her daddy and the other liberal Democrats who coach her on exactly what to say. So, why would anyone be surprised that they taught her how to hold a rifle?

And you say, "Watch the skeet explode every time". How about saying " It is easy to doctor tape to show whatever you want".

Clueless Barbie remains clueless. There is very little that any of you can doctor or spin to change that fact.

And, for the umpteenth time, what has she ever accomplished? I will admit that, from recent photographs, she doesn't go hungry. Maybe she is eating both her servings and the servings for the imaginary Andy Lundergan. She is also getting louder and shriller in her "presentation" of her memorized orations.

[TheRealVille]

Well, she is clearly a puppet for her daddy and the other liberal Democrats who coach her on exactly what to say. So, why would anyone be surprised that they taught her how to hold a rifle?

And you say, "Watch the skeet explode every time". How about saying " It is easy to doctor tape to show whatever you want".

Clueless Barbie remains clueless. There is very little that any of you can doctor or spin to change that fact.

And, for the umpteenth time, what has she ever accomplished? I will admit that, from recent photographs, she doesn't go hungry. Maybe she is eating both her servings and the servings for the imaginary Andy Lundergan. She is also getting louder and shriller in her "presentation" of her memorized orations.

I don't guess anybody would be surprised that you don't know the difference in a rifle, and a shotgun. On the other hand, she clearly knows how to handle a shotgun. You up for that little wager on Hillary as President, if she runs?



When presented, you ignore. Why waste the time?

[Harry Rex Vonner]

The dullards and takers of this country elected Obama twice. How could anyone bet that they won't elect Rodham next? And, of course, the media already has its collective head firmly stuck up her rather broad butt. This may be the only point upon which we agree although, I'm sure, it is for quite different reasons. And, as for Rodham running, she has been doing so for almost eight years.

Now back to Clueless Barbie. What has she accomplished other than polishing off another extra large pizza with an order or two of bread sticks?

As for the rifle-shotgun statement, I didn't bother to watch the fantasy tape. Does that mean I must surrender my concealed carry permit? I hope not because all of us who fund the dubious actions of this country may well need our permits to aid in fighting off a socialist, Muslim sympathizing government.

[TheRealVille]

The dullards and takers of this country elected Obama twice. How could anyone bet that they won't elect Rodham next? And, of course, the media already has its collective head firmly stuck up her rather broad butt. This may be the only point upon which we agree although, I'm sure, it is for quite different reasons. And, as for Rodham running, she has been doing so for almost eight years.

Now back to Clueless Barbie. What has she accomplished other than polishing off another extra large pizza with an order or two of bread sticks?

As for the rifle-shotgun statement, I didn't bother to watch the fantasy tape. Does that mean I must surrender my concealed carry permit? I hope not because all of us who fund the dubious actions of this country may well need our permits to aid in fighting off a socialist, Muslim sympathizing government.

You didn't have to watch it to see the firearm in question. From both the picture I posted, and the still frame on the front of the youtube video, it is plainly showing a shotgun. There is no shame in not knowing the difference in a rifle and a shotgun, just don't try to pull it off with people that know.

[TheRealVille]

^As for your concealed permit, you should know that KY permit numbers run consecutively. Mine is #3178. I have had a permit since KY started issuing them, and was the 3178th person to get one. I got mine in the first couple of months that they were issued.

Are you serious? You think that concealed permit will aid you in a government take over, that you seem to condone?

[Harry Rex Vonner]

You didn't have to watch it to see the firearm in question. From both the picture I posted, and the still frame on the front of the youtube video, it is plainly showing a shotgun. There is no shame in not knowing the difference in a rifle and a shotgun, just don't try to pull it off with people that know.

Actually, not that I expect you to believe it, I didn't notice what Clueless Barbie was holding. Her standing there with her usual stupid possum grin wearing goggles dominated the picture.

I am still waiting for you to tell me of one significant accomplishment of Little Lundergan. It is a trick question since she has accomplished nothing remotely worth noting.

Quit diverting the discussion and at least give a spin answer.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

^As for your concealed permit, you should know that KY permit numbers run consecutively. Mine is #3178. I have had a permit since KY started issuing them, and was the 3178th person to get one. I got mine in the first couple of months that they were issued.

Are you serious? You think that concealed permit will aid you in a government take over, that you seem to condone?

I'm pleased to learn that you passed the test and got your permit. However, as for twisting my statements, you are doing a poor job. Actually, I don't believe in the real taxpayers doing a "government take over". I believe in the real taxpayers taking back their country to return it to what was envisioned by the framers of the US Constitution.

Government takeovers are more closely associated with the deadbeats, freeloaders, derelicts, fairies, frauds, and amoral humanists who make up your ilk.

Now, how about trying to legitimize Clueless Barbie?

[TheRealVille]

Actually, not that I expect you to believe it, I didn't notice what Clueless Barbie was holding. Her standing there with her usual stupid possum grin wearing goggles dominated the picture.

I am still waiting for you to tell me of one significant accomplishment of Little Lundergan. It is a trick question since she has accomplished nothing remotely worth noting.

Quit diverting the discussion and at least give a spin answer.

Feel free to actually read the thread.

[TheRealVille]

^ She's got as much experience as Paul, or McConnell had going in.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

^ She's got as much experience as Paul, or McConnell had going in.

Now, that is truly a poor answer as well as being incorrect. Paul and McConnell both had a material amount of experience and accomplishment in their chosen professions before being elected to the US senate. Clueless Barbie was a gopher in a law firm (If you look at what she claims to have done and if you know anything about law firms, you know she was merely a gopher). On the basis of her daddy's name recognition and the fact that he is a Democrat, she was elected secretary of state- an office that runs itself because of its career merit employees. Her accomplishments in that office? Zero. Of course, she is rarely in her "office", is she?

You still have not named one single significant accomplishment of hers in her lifetime. You have continually evaded the question over and over again. Surely there is something. Maybe she was a cheerleader. Or maybe she was a homecoming attendant. Maybe she won a spelling bee in elementary school. Maybe she got a ticket (fixed of course) for speeding on Man 'o War Blvd. in Lexington.

She must have done something.

[TheRealVille]

Now, that is truly a poor answer as well as being incorrect. Paul and McConnell both had a material amount of experience and accomplishment in their chosen professions before being elected to the US senate. Clueless Barbie was a gopher in a law firm (If you look at what she claims to have done and if you know anything about law firms, you know she was merely a gopher). On the basis of her daddy's name recognition and the fact that he is a Democrat, she was elected secretary of state- an office that runs itself because of its career merit employees. Her accomplishments in that office? Zero. Of course, she is rarely in her "office", is she?

You still have not named one single significant accomplishment of hers in her lifetime. You have continually evaded the question over and over again. Surely there is something. Maybe she was a cheerleader. Or maybe she was a homecoming attendant. Maybe she won a spelling bee in elementary school. Maybe she got a ticket (fixed of course) for speeding on Man 'o War Blvd. in Lexington.

She must have done something.

She was a business attorney. She helped businesses get started, therefore she helped bring jobs to KY. Their professions helped them for senatorial duty? Paul couldn't even pass the "real" eye "bar", so he form his own association. You are nothing but a partisan republican hack, and you know it.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

She was a business attorney. She helped businesses get started, therefore she helped bring jobs to KY. Their professions helped them for senatorial duty? Paul couldn't even pass the "real" eye "bar", so he form his own association. You are nothing but a partisan republican hack, and you know it.

Your analysis of her legal experience is typical of someone with absolutely no clue as to how law offices work. But, since you are a supporter of Clueless Barbie, it makes sense that you would also be clueless. Believe me. She "created" no jobs. Gophers doing cast off and freebie work don't do anything remotely that would or could create a job unless you count the fact that, on occasion, experienced lawyers must step in and straighten up the mess often made by inexperienced gophers. Obviously, I know how it works. You don't, And, thus, you lap up the manure spread by her daddy and the rest of her inept campaign workers.

And, in typical liberal form, you resort to name calling when you have no valid response.

You, TheRealVille, are a true novice- just like your girl, Little Lundergan, and your boy, the incompetent Barry Obama. You lose. You offer no competition. But, you don't have a chance. No one can name any significant accomplishment of Clueless Barbie. There are none.

[Harry Rex Vonner]

She was a business attorney. She helped businesses get started, therefore she helped bring jobs to KY. Their professions helped them for senatorial duty? Paul couldn't even pass the "real" eye "bar", so he form his own association. You are nothing but a partisan republican hack, and you know it.

Also, you might want to educate yourself in regard to Rand Paul's credentials. He is an accomplished ophthalmologist who opened a free clinic for those in need. Now, he isn't a member of the AFL-CIO or UAW so you may find him deficient in his union associations and I don't think that he is married to someone who has disappeared.

Do your homework before blowing meaningless smoke, TheRealVille.

[TheRealVille]

Also, you might want to educate yourself in regard to Rand Paul's credentials. He is an accomplished ophthalmologist who opened a free clinic for those in need. Now, he isn't a member of the AFL-CIO or UAW so you may find him deficient in his union associations and I don't think that he is married to someone who has disappeared.

Do your homework before blowing meaningless smoke, TheRealVille.

Certified by his own made up certification board, where he is the head, his wife is the VP, and his father in law is secretary. He is not certified with the American Board of Ophthalmology, the standard certification board for ophthalmologist. His board is also not recognized with the ABMS, the standard for medical specialties certifications. He made up his own. He also settled a medical malpractice suit for 50k. I wouldn't say he's too accomplished. Even his own board was dissolved in 2011, so he better hope he stays in Washington, because he has no license now. :biglmao:

[Harry Rex Vonner]

Certified by his own made up certification board, where he is the head, his wife is the VP, and his father in law is secretary. He is not certified with the American Board of Ophthalmology, the standard certification board for ophthalmologist. His board is also not recognized with the ABMS, the standard for medical specialties certifications. He made up his own. He also settled a medical malpractice suit for 50k. I wouldn't say he's too accomplished. Even his own board was dissolved in 2011, so he better hope he stays in Washington, because he has no license now. :biglmao:

Boy, you get weaker with each passing post. Your ignorance of how the professions work is remarkable. If Paul did not have proper credentials, he couldn't practice. All in the professions know that. You need to expand your reading list past those Democrat/liberal comic books. Actually, I do take the possibility of Clueless Barbie being elected seriously. The electorate is made up, for the most part, of an abundance of dullards, freeloaders, minorities, and deadbeats and, as you well know, your party caters to all of them. Your people depend on the underbelly of humanity to win elections. Need proof? They elected an anti-capitalist, anti-Christian, anti-American, somewhat effeminate parasite president in 2008 and 2012.

Yep, TheRealVille, I know it is possible, though not probable, that Little Lundergan could win. It all depends on whether the majority of voters are those who contribute or those who continually take.

Of course, there are still two paramount questions:
1. Has Clueless Barbie ever accomplished anything of note in her 35+ years?
2. Where is Andy Lundergan?

You have demonstrated, time after time, that you can't answer either question so I guess I should answer them for you. The answer to #1 is "No". The answer to #2 is "In hiding".

[TheRealThing]

^^ I don't know what Rand Paul has to do with Alison losing the Senate race.

Here's something that does, and again shows the liberal propensity to self delusion.
EXCERPT---
"Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes, stung by several weeks worth of public polling that has shown her trailing Sen. Mitch McConnell by anywhere between 4 and 8 percentage points, pushed back on Wednesday by releasing her own internal poll that shows Grimes ahead by 1 percentage point.The poll of 800 likely voters had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points, said Mark Mellman, the Grimes campaign's Washington-based pollster.

In a telephonic press conference, Mellman refused to say how the poll screened for likely voters other than to say that it was based on voting history and voter registration files."
http://www.courier-journal.com/story/pol.../15391793/

The closer the election gets, the more people are going to sober up and vote for McConnell. All the reports of McConnell's untimely demise were "greatly exaggerated", and the stuff of one little 21% cliché, the liberal. Of course Mellman refused to say how he came up with those numbers. nicker:

[TheRealVille]

^ The point was, you guys elected a senator with no more experience than her, yet you bitch about her experience. Hypocrite much?

[TheRealThing]

^ The point was, you guys elected a senator with no more experience than her, yet you bitch about her experience. Hypocrite much?

Exaggerate much? I can't speak for everybody else on here but, I can tell you this, I don't agree with you. Alison is a novice by any standard. A hand picked 2nd choice of a yes girl for the DNC and Obama in particular. Dems are petrified by the fear that McConnell will win, and they're even more afraid control of the Senate may well boil down to one seat, his seat. Mitch has a nice lead and if the numbers were reversed you'd be feeling pretty confident. Liberal Camelot could be preserved if the unthinkable happens and Mitch is unseated. And the dutiful if shallow Harry Reid, could continue on in his role as Captain Gridlock.

The coming choice is clear, another vacuous though rabid liberal chipmunk entering high office, or stick with a not so perfect yet vastly experienced and much feared legislator, who has shown himself to be one of the few with the guts to stand up against liberalism. Nobody's perfect, but Mitch's resume reads like who's who from among the current list of high profile Congressional leaders, much less miss Alison. Comparing Alison's qualifications to Mitch, is like comparing a Little Leaguer to Babe Ruth, it cannot be done. And after all, we're not electing Rand Paul, who has acquitted himself quite handily BTW, nor do such abstract comparisons serve any real purpose other than to take away focus from the patently obvious. Alison by comparison to the one she's running against, is unqualified on the basis of her own resume to be a serious contender to replace the sitting Minority Leader of the US Senate. Especially since said Minority Leader happens to be our own state Senator. Therefore, replacing him with a freshman no name would be mindless and I don't believe it will be forthcoming. Not this time.

[TheRealVille]

Exaggerate much? I can't speak for everybody else on here but, I can tell you this, I don't agree with you. Alison is a novice by any standard. A hand picked 2nd choice of a yes girl for the DNC and Obama in particular. Dems are petrified by the fear that McConnell will win, and they're even more afraid control of the Senate may well boil down to one seat, his seat. Mitch has a nice lead and if the numbers were reversed you'd be feeling pretty confident. Liberal Camelot could be preserved if the unthinkable happens and Mitch is unseated. And the dutiful if shallow Harry Reid, could continue on in his role as Captain Gridlock.

The coming choice is clear, another vacuous though rabid liberal chipmunk entering high office, or stick with a not so perfect yet vastly experienced and much feared legislator, who has shown himself to be one of the few with the guts to stand up against liberalism. Nobody's perfect, but Mitch's resume reads like who's who from among the current list of high profile Congressional leaders, much less miss Alison. Comparing Alison's qualifications to Mitch, is like comparing a Little Leaguer to Babe Ruth, it cannot be done. And after all, we're not electing Rand Paul, who has acquitted himself quite handily BTW, nor do such abstract comparisons serve any real purpose other than to take away focus from the patently obvious. Alison by comparison to the one she's running against, is unqualified on the basis of her own resume to be a serious contender to replace the sitting Minority Leader of the US Senate. Especially since said Minority Leader happens to be our own state Senator. Therefore, replacing him with a freshman no name would be mindless and I don't believe it will be forthcoming. Not this time.

4 points? That's within the margin of error. You might want to rethink that "nice lead" comment, because Mitch himself is worried.

[TheRealThing]

4 points? That's within the margin of error. You might want to rethink that "nice lead" comment, because Mitch himself is worried.

You've already been told the Real Clear Politics average of polls has him up by 5+, and pulling away. In any case, he has a nice lead when all polls agree his lead is between a high of 8 points and a low of 4. But, if you prefer think that it puts more pressure on Mitch to be up 5, than the liberals to be down 5 and hoping for the impossible, that suits me.

[nky]

I notice you fail to provide links to your quotes. Are you hiding something?

Nope try this google.com

[TheRealVille]

You've already been told the Real Clear Politics average of polls has him up by 5+, and pulling away. In any case, he has a nice lead when all polls agree his lead is between a high of 8 points and a low of 4. But, if you prefer think that it puts more pressure on Mitch to be up 5, than the liberals to be down 5 and hoping for the impossible, that suits me.

"RealClearPolitics (RCP) is a Chicago-based political news and polling data aggregator formed in 2000[2] by former options trader John McIntyre and former advertising agency account executive Tom Bevan.[3][4][5] The site's founders say their goal is to give readers "ideological diversity,"[6] though the progressive media watchdog group Media Matters for America and others describe the site as being right wing.[7]"


If Ky's democrat majority shows up to vote, Mitch is in trouble.

[nky]

You do know"watchdog" media matters is very liberal right? Google
Byron York

[TheRealThing]

You do know"watchdog" media matters is very liberal right? Google
Byron York

LOL, sawing off the limb he's sitting on.

[TheRealThing]

"RealClearPolitics (RCP) is a Chicago-based political news and polling data aggregator formed in 2000[2] by former options trader John McIntyre and former advertising agency account executive Tom Bevan.[3][4][5] The site's founders say their goal is to give readers "ideological diversity,"[6] though the progressive media watchdog group Media Matters for America and others describe the site as being right wing.[7]"


If Ky's democrat majority shows up to vote, Mitch is in trouble.

"Kentucky defies any easy label of “red state” or “blue state.” The commonwealth is a place that was once solidly Democratic at both the state and federal levels. But now it’s common for parts of our listening area to send moderate and conservative Democrats to the General Assembly, while voting for extremely conservative candidates for U.S. House, Senate, and President."
http://wkyufm.org/post/many-kentucky-dem...republican